From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Danny Milosavljevic Subject: Re: GuixSD on eoma68-a20? Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2018 21:14:26 +0100 Message-ID: <20181216211426.09be476b@scratchpost.org> References: <68f9fc17-94f5-dcc2-f54d-61d6e2bf384d@riseup.net> <20181208181214.2308472a@scratchpost.org> <87pnubn386.fsf@netris.org> <20181209124800.495326cd@scratchpost.org> <87in0275ec.fsf@netris.org> <87va40x90s.fsf@gnu.org> <20181212091211.78d2e86d@scratchpost.org> <87efak5qp7.fsf@gnu.org> <20181215202137.4b3db598@scratchpost.org> <877eg9tqbv.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; boundary="Sig_/RigC1bCteAIcA40bARip_oY"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46772) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gYcoB-0003am-I2 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Dec 2018 15:14:40 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gYco8-0002cn-F8 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Dec 2018 15:14:39 -0500 In-Reply-To: <877eg9tqbv.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Ludovic =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?= Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, 33676@debbugs.gnu.org --Sig_/RigC1bCteAIcA40bARip_oY Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Ludo, > > The following package will be installed: > > guile-bootstrap 2.0 /tmp/guix-tests/store/1gd1z2r2a38bh3a44= 94jbhyzcv5mi5hl-guile-bootstrap-2.0 =20 >=20 > The solution I proposed only works if you=E2=80=99re using /gnu/store as = your > store prefix. Otherwise you cannot get substitutes from the build > farm. :-/ I do use /gnu/store , but I think the above was from a "guix" package unit = test. > > gnu/packages/scheme.scm:170:30: In procedure inputs: > > Throw to key `match-error' with args `("match" "no matching pattern" "a= rmhf-linux")'. =20 >=20 > This looks like the issue fixed in > 966629a114fd90153784dfdbe5e332e0ac94f1bc. Indeed. Now po4a fails one of the tests. It's not easy to get the image :) I'll try some more... --Sig_/RigC1bCteAIcA40bARip_oY Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEds7GsXJ0tGXALbPZ5xo1VCwwuqUFAlwWsiIACgkQ5xo1VCww uqUrPgf6A4/gGSMbkp97NtZZ1Hl5mVtHd1qrybEV1LL36R6lxCa98wPXZLbuz5Dz lgHeaq1Db8nbeXWmMA1pjDGWTK5bsKXGUtAk3xoc0Z7gOfwR5r03m+bysPBcTr9h IMvRVUpYCjAloupUq1r/PQ6xTDvPIssvkUqoctPUZdJd6+mFE2AV8gpFXDtjNlpY JUZuK9r2zkoIOzvj6ga+ICMNNQQZvlZB9wef2TpzK1xw54dGrmCpKY3lZ7aEGXLk /hMNKD50BfYyqWa0ukefOh6694Ancx8qMjMuKeDzmX2pdyZRun8mQQbaRg88qUWt hDI6+66nDnmB/ICykFoSUqCLYxj94A== =9Jqc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/RigC1bCteAIcA40bARip_oY--