From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ng0@n0.is Subject: Re: Using a CDN or some other mirror? Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2018 09:28:49 +0000 Message-ID: <20181205092849.7b6vlhvpaorusjuh@abyayala> References: <20181203154335.10366-1-ludo@gnu.org> <87tvju6145.fsf@gnu.org> <34d346ac-fc0a-aac2-f092-8a57e345c4e6@goebel-consult.de> <20181204211541.6kdb5zae6ltilyxv@abyayala> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44936) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gUTTJ-0002g3-U9 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Dec 2018 04:27:58 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gUTTG-0000ah-Ng for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Dec 2018 04:27:57 -0500 Received: from static.195.114.201.195.clients.your-server.de ([195.201.114.195]:50488 helo=conspiracy.of.n0.is) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gUTTG-0000ZI-Cn for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Dec 2018 04:27:54 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: "Thompson, David" Cc: hartmut@goebel-consult.de, guix-devel Thompson, David transcribed 1.2K bytes: > On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 4:15 PM wrote: > > > > Hartmut Goebel transcribed 771 bytes: > > > Am 03.12.2018 um 17:12 schrieb Ludovic Courtès: > > > > Thus, I’m thinking about using a similar setup, but hosting the mirror > > > > on some Big Corp CDN or similar. > > > > > > Isn't this a contradiction: Building a free infrastructure relaying on > > > servers from some Big Corporation? Let allow the privacy concerns > > > raising when delivering data via some Big Corporation. > > > > > > If delivering "packages" works via static data without requiring any > > > additional service, we could ask universities to host Guix, too. IMHO > > > this is a much preferred solution since this is a decentralized publish > > > infrastructure already in place for many GNU/Linux distributions. > > > > Regardless of me agreeing with Hartmut here, I suggest https://wasabi.com/ > > as an S3 compatible storage (, which is not run by Amazon.). > > But can Wasabi provide what CloudFront does? CloudFront is distinct > from S3, and can fetch and cache data from any origin. Additionally, > it stores data on edge nodes across the globe and routes requests > accordingly to maximize download speed. > > - Dave > Probably not, for some reason I thought you were discussing S3. My bad.