From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: bill-auger Subject: Re: Guix & IPFS Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2018 07:34:01 -0400 Message-ID: <20181016073401.284cc429@debian> References: <87r2grk5dj.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87lg6zfr20.fsf@gnu.org> <87lg6zjxwt.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <871s8rfmoe.fsf@gnu.org> <87a7nfjrml.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <877eijjot7.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <20181015140856.xd3de5hkumtaueer@thebird.nl> <8736t6jkpu.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <20181016094752.slvicfgd2rjy57u2@thebird.nl> <871s8qjjdh.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87zhvei48a.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44285) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gCNc3-0000U4-UA for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Oct 2018 07:34:12 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gCNbz-000087-VH for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Oct 2018 07:34:11 -0400 Received: from pop.dreamhost.com ([64.90.62.162]:49460 helo=pdx1-sub0-mail-a20.g.dreamhost.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gCNbz-00007E-Bl for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Oct 2018 07:34:07 -0400 Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a20.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pdx1-sub0-mail-a20.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C3D77F49F for ; Tue, 16 Oct 2018 04:34:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from debian (75-138-187-221.dhcp.oxfr.ma.charter.com [75.138.187.221]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: bill-auger@peers.community) by pdx1-sub0-mail-a20.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BFDD67F48B for ; Tue, 16 Oct 2018 04:34:04 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87zhvei48a.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: guix-devel@gnu.org FWIW, that reads to me like: "this program is extremely brittle and unfit for distribution in any distro - here, take our blob instead" perhaps guix is in a unique position to accommodate such constrained dependency requirements; but such caveat warnings are indicative of a project that is still in the beta stage, so i would not be very eager to package it