From: Danny Milosavljevic <dannym@scratchpost.org>
To: "Gábor Boskovits" <boskovits@gmail.com>
Cc: Guix-devel <guix-devel@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: Making javadoc reproducible
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2018 12:09:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181015120946.458cd536@scratchpost.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAE4v=phFRSq98fJGz4b0mVvSUTfnuOVO+tUwqNGGKxHfMDTtVg@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 820 bytes --]
Hi Gabor,
> There is a command line flag for javadoc (notimestamp), that disables
> generating the comment in the docs that contains the timestamp.
> Currently I see two ways forward:
> 1. Track down the calls to javadoc, and add the flag to all calls.
> 2. Write a simple patch to make javadoc behave as if notimestamp was
> specified, whenever
> SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH is defined.
> I do not think, that the patch produced by 2 is upstreamable, but it
> seems much less work. WDYT?
I'd like option 2 more. Also, I think it should be upstreamable.
Thanks for working on tihs!
I've meant to tackle this for quite some time but I didn't find how icedtea
gets the jdk sources in the first place (in order to patch it).
Putting a patch into the "patches" subdir blindly should work, but I
didn't try.
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-10-15 10:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-10-12 17:00 Making javadoc reproducible Gábor Boskovits
2018-10-12 17:35 ` Gábor Boskovits
2018-10-12 18:01 ` Björn Höfling
2018-10-12 18:14 ` Gábor Boskovits
2019-05-19 9:57 ` Mykola Nikishov
2019-05-19 13:46 ` Gábor Boskovits
2018-10-12 18:42 ` Vagrant Cascadian
2018-10-13 21:06 ` Alex Vong
2018-10-14 3:35 ` Chris Marusich
2018-10-14 6:43 ` Gábor Boskovits
2018-10-14 19:19 ` Gábor Boskovits
2018-10-15 10:09 ` Danny Milosavljevic [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://guix.gnu.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181015120946.458cd536@scratchpost.org \
--to=dannym@scratchpost.org \
--cc=boskovits@gmail.com \
--cc=guix-devel@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).