From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: =?UTF-8?B?QmrDtnJuIEjDtmZsaW5n?= <bjoern.hoefling@bjoernhoefling.de>
Subject: Re: Making javadoc reproducible
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2018 20:01:35 +0200
Message-ID: <20181012200135.505ba447@alma-ubu>
References: <CAE4v=phFRSq98fJGz4b0mVvSUTfnuOVO+tUwqNGGKxHfMDTtVg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAE4v=pi5fbxcryAd3aUpXEUox1O_PBKfs9mkvP-uUr2WQ6-M8w@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	boundary="Sig_/hOA_AQhCsw9yQbhpNWPTN84";
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48775)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bjoern.hoefling@bjoernhoefling.de>)
	id 1gB1kx-0007TO-RI
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Oct 2018 14:01:48 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bjoern.hoefling@bjoernhoefling.de>)
	id 1gB1kt-0000gS-Qv
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Oct 2018 14:01:47 -0400
Received: from m4s11.vlinux.de ([83.151.27.109]:47432 helo=bjoernhoefling.de)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bjoern.hoefling@bjoernhoefling.de>)
	id 1gB1kt-0000fo-Fz
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Oct 2018 14:01:43 -0400
In-Reply-To: <CAE4v=pi5fbxcryAd3aUpXEUox1O_PBKfs9mkvP-uUr2WQ6-M8w@mail.gmail.com>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: =?UTF-8?B?R8OhYm9y?= Boskovits <boskovits@gmail.com>
Cc: Guix-devel <guix-devel@gnu.org>

--Sig_/hOA_AQhCsw9yQbhpNWPTN84
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, 12 Oct 2018 19:35:51 +0200
G=C3=A1bor Boskovits <boskovits@gmail.com> wrote:

> G=C3=A1bor Boskovits <boskovits@gmail.com> ezt =C3=ADrta (id=C5=91pont: 2=
018. okt.
> 12., P, 19:00):
> >
> > Hello guix,
> >
> > I've tracked down the javadoc timestamp problem.
> > There is a command line flag for javadoc (notimestamp), that
> > disables generating the comment in the docs that contains the
> > timestamp. Currently I see two ways forward:
> > 1. Track down the calls to javadoc, and add the flag to all calls.
> > 2. Write a simple patch to make javadoc behave as if notimestamp was
> > specified, whenever
> > SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH is defined.
> > I do not think, that the patch produced by 2 is upstreamable, but it
> > seems much less work. WDYT? =20
>=20
> Also we can simply turn off the timestamp generation
> unconditionally...

Number 2 sounds good, and why not giving it a try to place it upstream?

Bj=C3=B6rn

--Sig_/hOA_AQhCsw9yQbhpNWPTN84
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iEYEARECAAYFAlvA4YAACgkQvyhstlk+X/1XYgCfYDyrRkBB7MFpgaQhecQzBSx1
oY4Anit6e0uOCTVUROSSSMPqhjTd0Mih
=QsqR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Sig_/hOA_AQhCsw9yQbhpNWPTN84--