From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: Firefox 52's end of life, packaging Chromium Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2018 02:52:52 -0400 Message-ID: <20180902065252.GA16911@jasmine.lan> References: <87ftyx35pw.fsf@lassieur.org> <87pny09rgo.fsf@elephly.net> <875zzozcnf.fsf@netris.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="KsGdsel6WgEHnImy" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57500) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fwMFo-0002Au-UX for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Sep 2018 02:53:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fwMFl-0003oQ-M9 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Sep 2018 02:53:00 -0400 Received: from wout2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.25]:51645) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fwMFl-0003n0-7B for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Sep 2018 02:52:57 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <875zzozcnf.fsf@netris.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Mark H Weaver Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, =?iso-8859-1?Q?Cl=E9ment?= Lassieur --KsGdsel6WgEHnImy Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Sep 02, 2018 at 01:33:40AM -0400, Mark H Weaver wrote: > Ricardo Wurmus writes: > > 1 There is still some data transmitted when starting the browser for the > > first time. It seems related to the "domain_reliability" component. > > 3 Opening settings transmits a bunch of data, the next version will > > include the 'disable-translation-lang-fetch' patch from Inox. >=20 > Guix _is_ committed to the GNU FSDG, right? That's my assumption (I know you didn't ask me directly). > Do you agree that #1 and #3 look like spyware? If so, wouldn't that > make them blockers? Maybe they are spyware, maybe they are not. I think there are legitimate reasons for a program to be "chatty". It depends on the user's expectations, what data is sent, and who it is sent to. We should keep looking into issues #1 and #3. Also, I think the Chromium package is being held to a very high standard compared to other packages, which is good, since web browsers are so important now. --KsGdsel6WgEHnImy Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEsFFZSPHn08G5gDigJkb6MLrKfwgFAluLiMEACgkQJkb6MLrK fwgnNw//T3iC5MH1MBm/h5joUjlcTqTgUCXuRvwksyJNsljiSrQmD8jkDvgfjtEN BbHK9pFOPB6BpdeGcv4552JmvgXPsNGF6FIrHhq7sqsHzDWtd555EvF4olVt1F8F TnfWc5OFi0aFRtxALu1z7iGiIEG7PY1MIm+t55JjQL3Ol5KlYyJEIiiG3uYysUWS VyY8RnF3lxiXKr/qEJlH5hUBkpwCVp0YOx5sk3MNE+/Y8qG79HamoUd7WoZFH4Gl PIaRfbly3tTJKDhUWdNrd5Q52bCOcXQbaOrH+i3w+vHTE+93UQAvRVpPPUtnVv1W rkmVegA5tA5/3s3R8RLLW9cqVWUI/daWx7b1qJ79FZiKOt/Ayky6QkTgC1WJTXKz c6K1hbBQqYpigod576HFE0qkuRh8IvzIcjlfaRVEslYAbum5Tc45uR37xboa6niV omYa2YzHvKhpgGgyP3TnYlE1LlVimGZZE2bo3wXDGhsoK4tm0EBhAjfePDkta3TQ WvTfJcOAPVw+I7Z7XqP0eIjW9JjoWYuqQZZ/GGbwjZZVdn4m+nx3VM4X2CZRtiED YY7Cetw0LB4GG2rxpWiY7ugxRqzDgCxR5EhgLF0AClIkZ5JfHGa3Ewx8qnTkgNS0 Oo55OqWm1BlbFdXmC2mGkONpIgkf2zES4ECSOy9iJ3sEpLw5Nkw= =4vbs -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --KsGdsel6WgEHnImy--