From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: Firefox 52's end of life, packaging Chromium Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2018 14:16:39 -0400 Message-ID: <20180829181639.GC26984@jasmine.lan> References: <87ftyx35pw.fsf@lassieur.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Clx92ZfkiYIKRjnr" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49473) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fv5Fz-0004uH-Tr for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Aug 2018 14:32:00 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fv51L-0001Ny-20 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Aug 2018 14:16:51 -0400 Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:58675) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fv51K-0001MD-Pe for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Aug 2018 14:16:46 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87ftyx35pw.fsf@lassieur.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Cl=E9ment?= Lassieur Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org --Clx92ZfkiYIKRjnr Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 11:03:07AM +0200, Cl=E9ment Lassieur wrote: > Firefox 52 isn't supported anymore upstream[1] and we don't have a > package for Firefox 60. Currently the only alternative is Epiphany but > it's close to unusable (it crashes every 5 minutes, and sometimes > freezes my computer). Please report these crashes to :) > So the question is: can we push the Chromium package? I've read it's > almost ready[2]. It's probably far better than everything we have, > despite not being totally 'finished'. Maybe we can add what's left to > do as a TODO and fix the package later? +1 --Clx92ZfkiYIKRjnr Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEsFFZSPHn08G5gDigJkb6MLrKfwgFAluG4wcACgkQJkb6MLrK fwgiQhAAtg50nAMR9cbfIo+02C9FOz169rfVDbrdnl7Vp2y9jH+PYhFyWyf0RV41 50v9EzQ+J4tvs+3tacAgnfSmV7/w8UTKdq4sN4eq8L8g1WOfeypPZe3YPajpFINa 01CmNWgogurS0uh7py83b2rC3QURqIKocGXgiaIZ+pcugaPvxvcXTPHEEKQfVM+f PzNRAqJq/qSk/FnVoVasZJkrWgkcsk0l3Ci+yHwmx8RquJTimKcne5+K97dQv1+D bG2J39gJvAX+/H7pjkMxBO6U8Fz1DUN3OmfGbouaoTJ9/Z4ky/kJF5iTaAkPAt8F a7Bf3syCIR4DdnH0Zu2IdMsQyjoL/vRtbQI/41oSTMwCWvjt7Z4+SlRBwpymiCpo AXV0cPFPWMdrWHmYHkQBsGmIXSA1ZLJtAgG3kFtizXU+Krra5MPNQPaKscsUUSOh cJGl2bHXEDc4pdKi1IwlkReXwOO0K9qma51Tp1ckyolOvTEe0RtSy+VW7wpZaNMZ LIXGLQ9BgqlVh+M2VrzFN8+g+2Zkety7pYHhIXuGrLDxZQzO4eNI4pqewadKUney avRBZrjtQLJB+fuwzRGHwY3GAncR1qE2G094IJ+7Xd+xaRwKyT7rcqlR+hW1dm8w sV4q3hulhqB4GWcJpKc1bq8AVvQ/VTHJOn7ijDyY3dTHM3MUyJI= =/r1i -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Clx92ZfkiYIKRjnr--