From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: Guix on aarch64 Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2018 15:50:19 -0400 Message-ID: <20180827195019.GB16718@jasmine.lan> References: <87mutm72n7.fsf@jnanam.net> <878t565k85.fsf@lassieur.org> <87k1oq6wgf.fsf@jnanam.net> <87bm9tbrx9.fsf@netris.org> <87zhxcoy0p.fsf@gnu.org> <87efelw1fr.fsf@netris.org> <20180826185922.GB18912@jasmine.lan> <87tvng1bib.fsf@elephly.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="uAKRQypu60I7Lcqm" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45992) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fuNWz-0003R7-2J for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Aug 2018 15:50:35 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fuNWv-00010z-Qh for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Aug 2018 15:50:32 -0400 Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:54099) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fuNWv-00010Z-H5 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Aug 2018 15:50:29 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87tvng1bib.fsf@elephly.net> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Ricardo Wurmus Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, Benjamin Slade --uAKRQypu60I7Lcqm Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 10:04:12AM +0200, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > I think our use of Hydra is not sustainable. It requires regular manual > intervention by Mark, careful tuning of SQL queries, conscientious > clean up of old substitutes, and we have not a single person familiar > with the Perl code. True, but in the meantime the Hydra web interface makes it relatively easy to judge when a branch is ready to merge into master. Can you recommend a workflow for doing this with Cuirass on berlin? > I agree. We need volunteers to pick a particular configuration (my > suggestion is to start with an Overdrive 3000 rack server[1]) and find a > place to host these servers. We have not been successful in delegating > this to other people and unfortunately the maintainers cannot take care > of this themselves. In my home I can host small-ish systems that don't require serious climate control. So, not the Overdrive 3000, but perhaps the Overdrive 1000. --uAKRQypu60I7Lcqm Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEsFFZSPHn08G5gDigJkb6MLrKfwgFAluEVfgACgkQJkb6MLrK fwjBHxAA2+qNgxzuLpoCXL8/XjvwFFGNIh1DurpkCwd+cCC38Wz+j4psLzuwadV6 H+zoyutjusVTpAQvSOzKrtzRc3I+WdUgYfTIhBIDJBbOoVFUIhuBO3h6hi5oEbrp VykaVSrUCiughLETNFjxpw8ZRwVg4os1Nb1WcSYuKa1srJWhVHxh7QrFVoxkl6St da5dPvD3OCb/2Hn8nZeX42sGKKLO1jOaUZ2cMQze6JirELguJE1LoMwroYnBMiJE d/IK3NaNE70r+3Fwml6RecyoOgoKCFCl55K7YxJhspoKRErAWd9dB6cDlY1KfIh2 NZkGDStKDPuIZlsgMAoTOBsky0d/13iULZkEr9vBBcJ9TFKhCiMLfzYEaTcpsnzb ubU1p29Rvpg6cCd1XK6igvwJCh041WPJpBIuOSoQJHKbsoCnEQ3jSuRkpbgB8M+g jNmlFS7GHwGrMZNbNR2glA1KQspOVwxHjzi/kFAYESi7gDiXu1jixq3erkZD6T2/ 6pyq3mDrViilF2WpoUnv20HvH8F1tbHeIWqLfV6F6mOlAOaU3Kx3eWRWnay+laC2 SyZ3sY1a3HxaxxV/mMot6cWk0AWFT3OHZxQOVUWXL33wVYeyQNAe9EKTCyVzkyE6 DDdIz53Usd7ga203uWH+AuCE7PrHCktp2ROcFjS24XuzVu8w+U4= =0Z2W -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --uAKRQypu60I7Lcqm--