From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nils Gillmann Subject: hplip qt Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2018 21:13:32 +0000 Message-ID: <20180621211332.7cbzlagcmbypygj3@abyayala> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39548) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fW6t1-00018U-7P for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 17:13:00 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fW6t0-0006J4-58 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 17:12:59 -0400 Received: from conspiracy.of.n0.is ([2a01:4f8:1c0c:7ad0::1]:47812) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fW6sz-0006Hy-Q3 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 17:12:58 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: guix-devel@gnu.org Tobias Geerinckx-Rice added in 407ef4b38ad394e0b63320b029d95afdd3da6888 support for Qt to Hplip. What feels like a lifetime ago, my patch with the same intention was reviewed and to be worked in a separation of Qt and hplip, which I found reasonable at that time but drowned in all the branches I had back then. Not forgotten though, just very low priority. I still find Qt as a dependency for hplip unreasonable. Can we split the package up as we did for Octave? Thanks.