Re: Code of Conduct and Diversity Statement

[Nils Gillmann <ng0@n0.is>]

swedebugia transcribed 1.7K bytes:
> Hi
> 
> On May 13, 2018 2:27:22 AM GMT+02:00, Tonton <tonton@riseup.net> wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> ... 
> > should we make the CoC more prominent or
> >somehow
> >inform about it better? For example by putting it or a link to it in
> >the topic
> >of the IRC channel, as it's own page on the website, if possible as
> >part of
> >the welcome message to the mailing lists, others?
> 
> Yes I think so. I like you proposals. I knew we had one and found it via the manual. 
> 
> >
> >A second question is, the contributor covenant has evolved, should we
> >upgrade
> >ours from 1.3.0 to the current
> >[1.4.0](https://www.contributor-covenant.org/version/1/4/code-of-conduct)?
> 
> This community does not really have any maintainers or formal leadership to my knowledge. 
> How to handle reporting in our case could be handled by here by vote appointing a person to handle such issues (for example as a mediator like in https://www.noisebridge.net/wiki/Conflict_Resolution) 

Here's another group working on "Guidelines for Moderators of Coexistence".
Their document is well-written and now translated in 3 languages:

https://structure.pages.de/convivenza.en

> >Would like to say that this is probably the best informatics community
> >I've
> >been part of and the reason I'm bringing it up is to make a statement
> >that we
> >care, and to make it easier for outsiders and potential participants to
> >see
> >that this is in fact part of our backbone. I'm so often positively
> >surprised
> >by the quality of communication here.
> 
> I agree. Conflicts here seem rare and to my knowledge well handled when they do.
> 
> Cheers
> Swedebugia