From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nils Gillmann Subject: Re: [bug#31076] gnurl 7.59.0 Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2018 16:51:22 +0000 Message-ID: <20180409165122.p64efbsgksbywnqr@abyayala> References: <20180406122457.dg5mvmgmuotfslho@abyayala> <87po39todl.fsf@gnu.org> <20180408212820.m7bt3juprgl5tfsr@abyayala> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46953) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f5a0W-0000bq-Qd for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Apr 2018 12:51:05 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f5a0V-0006Xu-Tb for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Apr 2018 12:51:04 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180408212820.m7bt3juprgl5tfsr@abyayala> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: guix-devel@gnu.org, Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Nils Gillmann transcribed 1.3K bytes: > Ludovic Courtès transcribed 474 bytes: > > Hi, > > > > Nils Gillmann skribis: > > > > > Seems like ftp.gnu.org is currently either very slow or having troubles > > > with the actual software distribution. The signatures landed on there, > > > the rest has yet to materialize. > > > > I think you made a mistake: > > > > gnurl-7.59.0.tar.gz.sig > > gnurl-7.59.0.tar.gz.sig.sig > > > > You’ll have to reupload without the extra .sig. :-) > > There were (are?) some issues on FTP side, they applied my new key > before realizing my new is too recent for their gpg. I'm currently > waiting on the result of the thread about this. > Furthermore it seems like the system can not cope very well with > anything that is not gpg and uses .sig ;) My signify signatures are > .sig, my gpg signatures are .asc .. > Anyway, we have to resolve some issues and archive some files in our > directory. > > Thanks :) > > > I’ve applied the patch since there’s a fallback URL anyway. > > > > Thanks, > > Ludo’. > > I'm looking into switching gnurl to bmake + mk-config. I've already got the > tools on my side. > Do you want me to continue the native autotools support for Guix in gnurl, > derived from curl? Or would it be okay to switch guix over to bmake + > mk-config if it works out for gnurl? > > I'm asking because I could manage to support 2 build-system, it just would > be a bit unconvenient for me. Correction: I noticed this will make building gnurl unpleasant on guix side. I would have to introduce the bmake + mk + the bootstrapping of bmake without make in the build system I'm currently working on.. in Guix, which is something I'm pretty sure will not be taken into master. Alternative: a simple bmake using the gnu-build-system (and therefore depending on make deeper down the graph) would be accepted I guess?