From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nils Gillmann Subject: Re: [bug#31076] gnurl 7.59.0 Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2018 21:28:20 +0000 Message-ID: <20180408212820.m7bt3juprgl5tfsr@abyayala> References: <20180406122457.dg5mvmgmuotfslho@abyayala> <87po39todl.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36970) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f5Hr1-0008Qu-Eh for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Apr 2018 17:28:04 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f5Hr0-0001y2-ID for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Apr 2018 17:28:03 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87po39todl.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: guix-devel@gnu.org Cc: Nils Gillmann Ludovic Courtès transcribed 474 bytes: > Hi, > > Nils Gillmann skribis: > > > Seems like ftp.gnu.org is currently either very slow or having troubles > > with the actual software distribution. The signatures landed on there, > > the rest has yet to materialize. > > I think you made a mistake: > > gnurl-7.59.0.tar.gz.sig > gnurl-7.59.0.tar.gz.sig.sig > > You’ll have to reupload without the extra .sig. :-) There were (are?) some issues on FTP side, they applied my new key before realizing my new is too recent for their gpg. I'm currently waiting on the result of the thread about this. Furthermore it seems like the system can not cope very well with anything that is not gpg and uses .sig ;) My signify signatures are .sig, my gpg signatures are .asc .. Anyway, we have to resolve some issues and archive some files in our directory. Thanks :) > I’ve applied the patch since there’s a fallback URL anyway. > > Thanks, > Ludo’. I'm looking into switching gnurl to bmake + mk-config. I've already got the tools on my side. Do you want me to continue the native autotools support for Guix in gnurl, derived from curl? Or would it be okay to switch guix over to bmake + mk-config if it works out for gnurl? I'm asking because I could manage to support 2 build-system, it just would be a bit unconvenient for me.