From: "Björn Höfling" <bjoern.hoefling@bjoernhoefling.de>
To: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Treating tests as special case
Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2018 14:19:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180405141947.6dfeb927@alma-ubu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87fu4aj6xu.fsf@elephly.net>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 998 bytes --]
On Thu, 05 Apr 2018 12:14:53 +0200
Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net> wrote:
> Björn Höfling <bjoern.hoefling@bjoernhoefling.de> writes:
>
> > And you mentioned different environment conditions like machine and
> > kernel. We still have "only" 70-90% reproducibility.
>
> Where does that number come from? In my tests for a non-trivial set
> of bioinfo pipelines I got to 97.7% reproducibility (or 95.2% if you
> include very minor problems) for 355 direct inputs.
>
> I rebuilt on three different machines.
I have no own numbers but checked Ludivic's blog post from October 2017:
https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/blog/2017/reproducible-builds-a-status-update/
"We’re somewhere between 78% and 91%—not as good as Debian yet, [..]".
So if your numbers are valid for the whole repository, that is good
news and would mean we are now better than Debian [1], and that would
be worth a new blog post.
Björn
[1] https://isdebianreproducibleyet.com/
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 181 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-05 12:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-05 5:24 Treating tests as special case Pjotr Prins
2018-04-05 6:05 ` Gábor Boskovits
2018-04-05 8:39 ` Pjotr Prins
2018-04-05 8:58 ` Hartmut Goebel
2018-04-05 6:21 ` Björn Höfling
2018-04-05 8:43 ` Pjotr Prins
2018-04-06 8:58 ` Chris Marusich
2018-04-06 18:36 ` David Pirotte
2018-04-05 10:14 ` Ricardo Wurmus
2018-04-05 12:19 ` Björn Höfling [this message]
2018-04-05 14:10 ` Ricardo Wurmus
2018-04-05 10:26 ` Ricardo Wurmus
2018-04-05 14:14 ` Ludovic Courtès
2018-04-05 14:59 ` Pjotr Prins
2018-04-05 15:17 ` Ricardo Wurmus
2018-04-05 15:24 ` Ludovic Courtès
2018-04-05 16:41 ` Pjotr Prins
2018-04-05 18:35 ` Pjotr Prins
2018-04-06 7:57 ` Retaining substitutes Ludovic Courtès
2018-04-05 20:26 ` Treating tests as special case Mark H Weaver
2018-04-06 6:06 ` Pjotr Prins
2018-04-06 8:27 ` Ricardo Wurmus
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://guix.gnu.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180405141947.6dfeb927@alma-ubu \
--to=bjoern.hoefling@bjoernhoefling.de \
--cc=guix-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=rekado@elephly.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).