From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?utf-8?B?VG9tw6HFoSDEjGVjaA==?= Subject: Re: An April 1 joke? Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add systemd. Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2018 02:06:09 +0200 Message-ID: <20180405000609.GA9122@doom> References: <1522662136.3259.35.camel@gmail.com> <20180402143822.GA26072@jasmine.lan> <1522846191.3197.72.camel@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="envbJBWh7q8WU6mo" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40946) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f3sPy-0001fR-6I for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Apr 2018 20:06:19 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f3sPx-0007w8-76 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Apr 2018 20:06:18 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:53532) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f3sPx-0007vn-1V for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Apr 2018 20:06:17 -0400 Received: from [2a00:c500:22e:1d3:593a:e2b1:6d07:eb] (port=46670 helo=gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1f3sPw-0007pA-By for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Apr 2018 20:06:16 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1522846191.3197.72.camel@gmail.com> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: guix-devel@gnu.org --envbJBWh7q8WU6mo Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello, On Wed, Apr 04, 2018 at 02:49:51PM +0200, Svante Signell wrote: > ... > >And the same happens again: He does not condemn systemd, calling it Free >Software due to the GPL license. In my opinion systemd is violating one of= the 4 >freeedoms of GPL: Freedom 1 (as well as the *NIX and KISS philosophy) >=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0* The freedom to study how the program works, and change= it so it >=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0does your computing as you wish (freedom 1). Acces= s to the >=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0source code is a precondition for this. > >It's really time for a re-definition of Free Software, not only basing such >definitions solely on the license at hand. It is also a matter of freedoms= of >the users of software. Especially in view of that most Free Software nowad= ays is >developed by commercial players, having their own agenda, actively alienat= ing >their users (and non-paid, spare time developers). could please you explain me your point of view? I can see systemd's source code published on github with the license guaranteeing me that I can study it and fork it to change it. Best regards, S_W --envbJBWh7q8WU6mo Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEDOrssfr9jDQthC2PSiPjT6AzQ20FAlrFaGgACgkQSiPjT6Az Q20o3A/+KDl5e/rPc0jKQqQ/YLdQyqSuW14ZPTczEeQQieNZzDpXGTGGaSfg/ich 0ra2Knb6hZlcYUCE9bD62GJEalss8596MzVTD11jBqpWEVADKzPAXgJ4BECqsH2O wQzRC3TeVrODrUE0IEeT4lIHMMB8ZxGPUPCyeQZJVDC8sqLDMRKHU0RI4W0b+lGP JCop7gz9jZ0xnA37FuhOh0jz9GeKt8mgUlnNM1pQav2OEAJq4/63A4XJJWyov372 a7XsuzhuDFF9cqjVIdidIl1ViNFJKmuzl+qUM1+YSfNip4R/1x45hWI+0FmNOitb uViLjmmDoWr1scXg09uKQiZTZvdojFlZpqC5dSHOSIhG18YKiXAj7FwRWn3VvXFi 252CxLtwT6odx/SiJoKEtzd7it8FqVaqC6CGSdOPHYC7SkLL2XUPNWlatRTN7L2H KmjQWMUa/QcvNwlj7YrlINRQDtCfknFhicYKn1gyIzfAZ2G8GWY5z7geC3vo73z+ PRJj+tP4W0a+7Ct0MCAs5UYQybaAqzs1wbaqV6rbvpukKFhXBq0AsRx71zeXH2Us 5WG0lbSxgUR2kl5l2L4Nk+4mTnws6rRMvATdpY8B/lfE9acxmRiLldf3Ln93GCeT x8Q3pLFeKr9JlqD79Ny3eAIpryOWumVMX9J/G/TfSyjeY/jZu+Q= =8vaM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --envbJBWh7q8WU6mo--