From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Efraim Flashner Subject: omvf firmware Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2018 21:48:15 +0200 Message-ID: <20180315194815.GA1080@macbook41> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="wRRV7LY7NUeQGEoC" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:32863) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ewYrN-000698-UT for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Mar 2018 15:48:22 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ewYrK-0004oq-NI for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Mar 2018 15:48:21 -0400 Received: from flashner.co.il ([178.62.234.194]:34692) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ewYrK-0004o5-FO for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Mar 2018 15:48:18 -0400 Received: from localhost (46-117-130-5.bb.netvision.net.il [46.117.130.5]) by flashner.co.il (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B6DCB400B7 for ; Thu, 15 Mar 2018 19:48:16 +0000 (UTC) Content-Disposition: inline List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: guix-devel@gnu.org --wRRV7LY7NUeQGEoC Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I succesfully built ovmf firmware for aarch64 on my aarch64 board. Currently it builds for x86_64 and i686 on %intel platforms only. I think it's best to create a make-ovmf-firmware procedure to build the firmware for x86_64/i686/aarch64/armhf, but there's not a clear cross-grade path from our current x86_64 & i686 package to x86_64 or i686. The two other options I've thought of are adding aarch64 and armhf support to our current package, which would balloon the native-inputs with cross compilers, or leave the current package and add 1 or 2 new pacakges, but then I feel like that's almost back to my original intent of creating a procedure and 4 packages. Suggestions? Comments? --=20 Efraim Flashner =D7=90=D7=A4=D7=A8=D7=99=D7=9D = =D7=A4=D7=9C=D7=A9=D7=A0=D7=A8 GPG key =3D A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted --wRRV7LY7NUeQGEoC Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEoov0DD5VE3JmLRT3Qarn3Mo9g1EFAlqqzfwACgkQQarn3Mo9 g1H+HQ//RXTNnpMfS4bMwLjwOOAWssOZNsvjFjgV/nG8WpoT2dmwElrAbTtsjSg9 j2GmkID3OEAwn6vUGUdBiiv50Vi2CH5vNArHPgW3LPLIH0DwBoZHpJaY5lKi4dM4 nlLhY7IX/Xxg0vkhldy8z1x10LscLbQKFTMnvzH+Phs41lZgI74wuQ8xV3fDr+xP bq8EJyb47c7za/YhkSkktUOhoQbu0pSIPolHohdLrKW3GI/e6iLOX3vVWr+lcqxO M9nUSykkMyOjeJWyjJXXz2NA3EQ5b8CqKsIDpjPsuebr8Rw9wG9dwjeM4v4YiAgj SIabFL7Qw02nQWuoxA+mUerPt2iOkcQygVYoBOJ0gr2IIySs8j+mEpeS3XWx4lWW eubA9j2L2xXgp6N/0/JQeSxjbeQoG19KjKn/yf2w4nQ7wE+MivDcId3E63RdSfc8 r44Eq97CVoUSwN4VDL9z1YACQPodOyFHKSiUim9wFBh+Dj1LEMoBqVM+fM2b/pRd Mns/wd236Ql7tMY5aQ1MDYWlQXrl12QRB24JBN2Jqu3yi2mtk+gzzmwjXcmUr6kq TCjSHQ2Co5DgZzQH4NIwMKq2SfaXweI1bCPHl8BtJqcm9mmFA/SHJyE+vlwCPRqf 0WpY5vBZvuptcQsBBJGUNW4S90z2v1gj5Yv3enBelSwfSK/YfFY= =tg/D -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --wRRV7LY7NUeQGEoC--