0.14.1?

0.14.1?

[Efraim Flashner]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 671 bytes --]

We now have aarch64 build machines, but there wasn't one when 0.14.0 was
released. This means that if someone installs guix on aarch64 and tries
to run 'guix pull' then they have to build from the bootstrap binaries
to guix before pulling and then compiling HEAD.  I tried this myself on
Scaleway, which offers aarch64 VMs, and was met by test errors.

Also, for aarch64 at least, berlin.guixsd.org should be added to the
default substitute servers.

-- 
Efraim Flashner   <efraim@flashner.co.il>   אפרים פלשנר
GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D  14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

Re: 0.14.1?

[Ludovic Courtès]

Hello,

Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il> skribis:

> We now have aarch64 build machines, but there wasn't one when 0.14.0 was
> released. This means that if someone installs guix on aarch64 and tries
> to run 'guix pull' then they have to build from the bootstrap binaries
> to guix before pulling and then compiling HEAD.  I tried this myself on
> Scaleway, which offers aarch64 VMs, and was met by test errors.

I’m all for 0.14.1 (we initially wanted to do that by FOSDEM…).

I would like to add the new Shepherd as well, which should be ready
anytime soon.

Thoughts?

> Also, for aarch64 at least, berlin.guixsd.org should be added to the
> default substitute servers.

I’ve pushed a change to default to berlin.guixsd.org on aarch64.  People
still need to authorize the right key, though.

Ludo’.

Re: 0.14.1?

[Efraim Flashner]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1322 bytes --]

On Mon, Mar 05, 2018 at 10:41:34AM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il> skribis:
> 
> > We now have aarch64 build machines, but there wasn't one when 0.14.0 was
> > released. This means that if someone installs guix on aarch64 and tries
> > to run 'guix pull' then they have to build from the bootstrap binaries
> > to guix before pulling and then compiling HEAD.  I tried this myself on
> > Scaleway, which offers aarch64 VMs, and was met by test errors.
> 
> I’m all for 0.14.1 (we initially wanted to do that by FOSDEM…).
> 
> I would like to add the new Shepherd as well, which should be ready
> anytime soon.
> 
> Thoughts?
> 
> > Also, for aarch64 at least, berlin.guixsd.org should be added to the
> > default substitute servers.
> 
> I’ve pushed a change to default to berlin.guixsd.org on aarch64.  People
> still need to authorize the right key, though.
> 

That shouldn't be too hard, if you use the install script and say 'yes'
to using the substitute servers, it includes berlin.guixsd.org as a
substitute server.

-- 
Efraim Flashner   <efraim@flashner.co.il>   אפרים פלשנר
GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D  14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

Re: 0.14.1?

[Andreas Enge]

On Mon, Mar 05, 2018 at 10:41:34AM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> I would like to add the new Shepherd as well, which should be ready
> anytime soon.

It would be important to fix bug
   https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=30299
first, and maybe other shepherd related bugs in the tracker.

Andreas

Re: 0.14.1?

[Ricardo Wurmus]

Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> writes:

> Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il> skribis:
>
>> We now have aarch64 build machines, but there wasn't one when 0.14.0 was
>> released. This means that if someone installs guix on aarch64 and tries
>> to run 'guix pull' then they have to build from the bootstrap binaries
>> to guix before pulling and then compiling HEAD.  I tried this myself on
>> Scaleway, which offers aarch64 VMs, and was met by test errors.
>
> I’m all for 0.14.1 (we initially wanted to do that by FOSDEM…).

Now that so much time has passed and so many packages have been added
and updated we could even do 0.15.0.

--
Ricardo

GPG: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6  2150 197A 5888 235F ACAC
https://elephly.net

Re: 0.14.1?

[Andreas Enge]

On Mon, Mar 05, 2018 at 06:07:07PM +0100, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
> Now that so much time has passed and so many packages have been added
> and updated we could even do 0.15.0.

This should be one of the few pleasures of the release managers,
to decide about version numbers and code names!

Andreas