From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Efraim Flashner Subject: Re: Staging Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2018 15:14:39 +0200 Message-ID: <20180220131439.GC23825@macbook41> References: <20180220014627.GA1984@jasmine.lan> <87371wco3n.fsf@fastmail.com> <20180220094558.GB23825@macbook41> <20180220115706.GC17373@jasmine.lan> <20180220120711.GA14718@jurong> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="tqI+Z3u+9OQ7kwn0" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39598) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eo7kr-0004kF-Kl for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Feb 2018 08:14:46 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eo7kn-00078C-IU for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Feb 2018 08:14:45 -0500 Received: from flashner.co.il ([178.62.234.194]:46716) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eo7kn-00077l-B7 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Feb 2018 08:14:41 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180220120711.GA14718@jurong> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Andreas Enge Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org --tqI+Z3u+9OQ7kwn0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 01:07:11PM +0100, Andreas Enge wrote: > On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 06:57:06AM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 11:45:58AM +0200, Efraim Flashner wrote: > > > Java currently only affects x86_64, so I'm not sure that it would need > > > to be staging specifically. In any case if we can get it merged within > > > the next week or so that'd be amazing. I know our cmake is in need of= an > > > upgrade, maybe libva? > >=20 > > Are there any specific issues that would be fixed by a CMake update, or > > is it just "too old"? I think that changes on the staging branch should > > have a low probability of breaking things, so that we can finish the > > branch quickly. >=20 > Could we stage things on the staging branch? Do a few updates now, merge > quickly, and then try to update only cmake in the next run? >=20 CMake is just old, not especially in need of updates. It would be nice to ungraft stuff though. --=20 Efraim Flashner =D7=90=D7=A4=D7=A8=D7=99=D7=9D = =D7=A4=D7=9C=D7=A9=D7=A0=D7=A8 GPG key =3D A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted --tqI+Z3u+9OQ7kwn0 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEoov0DD5VE3JmLRT3Qarn3Mo9g1EFAlqMHzsACgkQQarn3Mo9 g1GO3g//anMtWEWiSllpQL9fcS6SgMfpTdA/MAhdOp+WBkz7yaQ6xhFOD68fdxJu 38UulSK53iegU7RBcquPP3sOWa7MgP6Ci8BZcBiJu2dVXTUEsWb9pD7unvF7uptK XMMogFo007RxAu/ksB1deAaTriLsgyV29rCEn7oV3S6lQzlMMe8DScIdUsQum0K+ GtSsdGE7jvbRtxC4R2RC3CwqxoMDBKg0LfT8xPJq1Ju66ZxzWuIMdOMEC4lnWH9V gz4SLH/IlSNJv1Cz23pjP1WTWHVpOpPZUazKo+QLiKnrLtNKZKfR9BtKjjglNUUr T+/vzu9NmmNuXLHpfjafTLNdPrQ8/iiyXsjD1XHHdZ+tRlgDLTWGZifbbM2ozFLh Eq/OkdK6K7G0nb9x5BnxHHuBGIcX31oOBVpbHMYy90q++U+LMtPwR4rGGkPqBg4U zJpaJlVvuGmf1s1TUcSr2gP8szrLxYNDKNnCawrXgSPnLCJB0GtvIGIh5GXRbLdR NF3/60g8tmzGTstinyii4I2fe/SSAaS/ozqMue5MepSFa/NxwnpZQbZWXDBL1EvG dx6pnnFFke8g4cRYof7ydZUgLLPLtCqJnppcfkghaqeihZkx7oZ9CN8+/lydQ9Fa i09e2uu0TRDm8rOqTeckYyiey4l2qpofaQaU+so66vHwTyDGqB4= =dKIj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --tqI+Z3u+9OQ7kwn0--