From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr>
Subject: Re: Staging
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2018 13:07:11 +0100
Message-ID: <20180220120711.GA14718@jurong>
References: <20180220014627.GA1984@jasmine.lan> <87371wco3n.fsf@fastmail.com>
	<20180220094558.GB23825@macbook41>
	<20180220115706.GC17373@jasmine.lan>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49784)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <andreas@enge.fr>) id 1eo6hZ-00027V-Kj
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Feb 2018 07:07:18 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <andreas@enge.fr>) id 1eo6hY-0003Ok-OJ
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Feb 2018 07:07:17 -0500
Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([2a0c:e300::1]:41426)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <andreas@enge.fr>) id 1eo6hY-0003Nu-Hf
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Feb 2018 07:07:16 -0500
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20180220115706.GC17373@jasmine.lan>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 06:57:06AM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 11:45:58AM +0200, Efraim Flashner wrote:
> > Java currently only affects x86_64, so I'm not sure that it would need
> > to be staging specifically. In any case if we can get it merged within
> > the next week or so that'd be amazing. I know our cmake is in need of an
> > upgrade, maybe libva?
> 
> Are there any specific issues that would be fixed by a CMake update, or
> is it just "too old"? I think that changes on the staging branch should
> have a low probability of breaking things, so that we can finish the
> branch quickly.

Could we stage things on the staging branch? Do a few updates now, merge
quickly, and then try to update only cmake in the next run?

Andreas