From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Danny Milosavljevic <dannym@scratchpost.org>
Subject: Re: [bug#29096] [PATCH] gnu: Add Epson escpr printer driver.
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2018 23:47:48 +0100
Message-ID: <20180126234748.76b6cfdd@scratchpost.org>
References: <87shdyg2p7.fsf@GlaDOS.home>
	<20180124232041.25cefb0b@scratchpost.org>
	<87bmhgfel6.fsf@GlaDOS.home>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60058)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <dannym@scratchpost.org>) id 1efCmu-0000N9-HL
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Jan 2018 17:48:01 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <dannym@scratchpost.org>) id 1efCmr-000769-FY
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Jan 2018 17:48:00 -0500
Received: from dd26836.kasserver.com ([85.13.145.193]:53820)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <dannym@scratchpost.org>)
	id 1efCmr-00075D-7P
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Jan 2018 17:47:57 -0500
In-Reply-To: <87bmhgfel6.fsf@GlaDOS.home>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Diego Nicola Barbato <dnbarbato@posteo.de>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

On Fri, 26 Jan 2018 23:19:17 +0100
Diego Nicola Barbato <dnbarbato@posteo.de> wrote:

> I agree that it is hard to discover.  Is it OK if I simply apply your
> proposed extension to the documentation?

Yes.