Hi ng0, that might be a good idea. I was disturbed to learn that SLiM has seemingly been abandoned since 2013 (source: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/SLiM), so lightdm might be a good light-weight alternative as the default display manager. Do you know if the lightdm process itself can run on Wayland (like GDM)? @Mark SDDM for the moment cannot run on Wayland yet, which is why it starts its own X server. I don't think I've had some of the problems you had with GNOME. Could you try logging in once via a display manager to GNOME (either X11 or Wayland is fine), then logging out, stopping the display manager and running the following command on a TTY: XDG_SESSION_TYPE=wayland dbus-run-session gnome-session One of the problems I've run into myself is that X11 screen lockers like xlock don't seem to work. In GNOME GDM is supposed to be the screen locker I believe, but I don't think that works at the moment. I'll try and see if there's a simple Wayland-based screen locker we could use later. On Thu, 4 Jan 2018 08:38:58 +0000 ng0 wrote: > Mark H Weaver transcribed 2.4K bytes: > > Hi Rutger, > > > > Rutger Helling writes: > > > > > I've sent in a patch (#29943) that adds a small paragraph to the > > > documentation about the current situation. > > > > > > I believe there was a plan to replace SLiM with GDM for the > > > default login manager. Getting GDM to work properly should > > > probably be the first step since it has great Wayland support. > > > From what I know GDM can default to Wayland and falls back > > > automatically to X11 if for some reason Wayland doesn't work. > > > > > > Alternatively we could switch to SDDM as the default for now, > > > until GDM is ready. > > What about lightdm? Does it not offer wayland support? > We have no service for it yet, but as far as I understand the greeters > (like 'lightdm-gtk-greeter') writing your own theme is relatively > standardized. > > > I recently switched my x86_64 GuixSD laptop to use SDDM, so I could > > try out GNOME on Wayland. It mostly works, but there are still a > > few problems: > > > > * Even after logging in, SDDM is still visibly running within > > xorg-server on VT 7, while Wayland is running on VT 8. If you > > switch back to VT 7, you can see the login screen still there, with > > the clock showing the time that you logged in instead of the > > current time. I'm not sure if there are security implications to > > this, but it's certainly a waste of system resources. > > > > * SDDM is based on Qt, so it substantially increases the closure > > size of the system, as well as memory usage since SDDM and > > Xorg-server continues to run in another VT during your entire > > session. > > > > * The "Sound" panel of the GNOME settings is non-functional. > > Whenever I try to change anything at all in that panel, it crashes. > > > > * Startup notification for several GNOME programs is broken, e.g. > > GNOME Terminal, Files (Nautilus), Videos (Totem), and possibly > > other. When I launch any of those programs, although the program > > immediately starts up, GNOME Shell doesn't seem to realize this, > > and for quite some time the spinner continues to indicate that the > > application is starting up, and it doesn't show up in the Alt-Tab > > application switcher. If you switch to another application, you > > cannot switch back to it via Alt-Tab. > > > > * As far as I know, we haven't yet themed SDDM to include our > > beautiful GuixSD login screen artwork. It would be a shame to lose > > that by default. > > > > On the other hand, I'm pleased to report that under Wayland, > > tearing no longer occurs during video playback, scrolling, etc. > > > > Anyway, it's very exciting to see progress on this, but I'm > > reluctant to bring Qt into our default system closure, and > > furthermore I'd be inclined to wait until more of the > > aforementioned problems are addressed. > > > > What do you think? > > > > Mark > > > > >