From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ng0 Subject: Are the gitolite SHa-bang issues gone? Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2017 18:57:02 +0000 Message-ID: <20171227185702.5gwektf6b7nwmmzy@abyayala> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ym4gszjr4w5ugghe" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37626) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eUGtN-0001iT-4h for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Dec 2017 13:57:32 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eUGtG-0001u9-Tr for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Dec 2017 13:57:29 -0500 Received: from aibo.runbox.com ([91.220.196.211]:46984) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eUGtG-0001nJ-Ir for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Dec 2017 13:57:22 -0500 Received: from [10.9.9.211] (helo=mailfront11.runbox.com) by mailtransmit03.runbox with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eUGtC-00044v-As for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Dec 2017 19:57:18 +0100 Received: from p4fd8b098.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([79.216.176.152] helo=localhost) by mailfront11.runbox.com with esmtpsa (uid:892961 ) (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) id 1eUGsy-00009j-8I for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Dec 2017 19:57:04 +0100 Content-Disposition: inline List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: guix-devel@gnu.org --ym4gszjr4w5ugghe Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hey '(guix)! I just was "ambushed" by 3 very ambitious hackers in one of my groups about Guix and GuixSD specific tasks [0]. The only thing which matters and I'm not certain about is this: We used to build gitolite in a way that SHa-bangs would be patched where actually the files are templates and patching the SHa-bangs to the store would break gitolite in unpredictable ways. Has this been fixed, or is there some open bug ticket I can't remember or something we could do manually in a GuixSD config? Sorry for being so fuzzy about it and the fuzzy grammar, I'm feeling really fuzzy with the lack of sleep of the last 2 days. I'm asking today because we want to talk about this tomorrow afternoon again (Berlin Timezone). 0: Actually it's a precondition for another project I'm working on aswell. ng0, who is once more reminded that night trains suck when you can't catch = up sleep the morning you arrive. --=20 GnuPG: A88C8ADD129828D7EAC02E52E22F9BBFEE348588 GnuPG: https://c.n0.is/ng0_pubkeys/tree/keys WWW: https://n0.is --ym4gszjr4w5ugghe Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEqIyK3RKYKNfqwC5S4i+bv+40hYgFAlpD7P4ACgkQ4i+bv+40 hYhyTw//cwzVVtaXKqq9Tz9igT3t8z3/HVYhAZutCf/lLLwVEFQAsHSfZkZ4HaS8 TNSOGyeMVob6Agzkn4I0+lNINgLAgfKsG1XwjbEg9Fo+h23YfEkzideHJ0UfPRec oYy/URoTC8iy61jla+V+4WcHMNOG7mn6KKjksY7kD6aIHhU/abqrHfi9ZMhVpPA4 zT4i9/CRdGA7krJr7PXrerYjl5wLdBy3LLCg2v4xQ+ek4jGn5F9gBU8EPD3gb+tQ /Cz4MJlppg5i8MI8zGwkYUarwiPaDNxGq2NGxGSsKRgh29ugXE4cphn2qKVadRn2 2GkFSxv10jgEG/OwSlTuujeGalrseH9YhpcrQO6e/NY4WflkJSotDAQrHeKQrOAP L8odD3SdeDKaEiKglI4G41tUlgiPJ+15B0YS9O/D/L7fGvRaxWAYXmJRNQQ8rHsa NPJbt00C4GC5aBFW64CNliMD57Cd2H+ChNag2MWpoAdn7VYLpU1pO48XMpYvAmJR Z2qbLN/EheEUuxf5X71RPOph5AZVq+dtIFb0P6Mts87FFPmcyqWBPOtuY/iYxxGE IoKHoYqVUpg58Ey8iQXPhFMbFRSUWbOHqxIBZkeEc6EnrJztRiLYRoim6siTml1h Hn9bvivq6ViFxnj19LXCrYmAA67zTye2Oa6BVf7YC5Tyb2fV2jY= =oOz6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ym4gszjr4w5ugghe--