From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: Let's build 'core-updates'! Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2017 08:20:56 -0400 Message-ID: <20171103122056.GA5341@jasmine.lan> References: <87wp382zgh.fsf@fastmail.com> <20171102212917.GA3376@macbook41> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="rwEMma7ioTxnRzrJ" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42243) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eAayc-0001rF-0x for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Nov 2017 08:21:35 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eAayY-00071e-Rd for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Nov 2017 08:21:34 -0400 Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]:53273) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eAayY-00070g-Ke for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Nov 2017 08:21:30 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20171102212917.GA3376@macbook41> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Efraim Flashner Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org --rwEMma7ioTxnRzrJ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Nov 02, 2017 at 11:29:17PM +0200, Efraim Flashner wrote: > On Thu, Nov 02, 2017 at 09:33:02PM +0100, Marius Bakke wrote: > > We are still missing the "binutils" update. Efraim, do you remember > > what the issue with 2.29 was? >=20 > binutils-boot0 built fine, I don't remember what the next -boot0 package > was, but it failed completely so I reverted it. I was also worried about > all the CVEs showing up, and the couple that I checked didn't affect > 2.28.1. There are many recent bug disclosures in binutils that I have not paid attention to. We should try to get them fixed in this cycle. > > Is there anything else we should consider this round? Maybe the > > automatic wrapping from ? Sounds good. > We should update cmake. It would also be nice if we could get rid of > some of libjpeg-8 and other similar older versions, but that's something > that can wait for the next round if need be. We've already added the > python update branch in, so we should make sure to update the packages > like pytest to only have the later version. If we have any more packages > without modify-phases that can be taken care of also. Sounds good. Does anyone volunteer to handle some of those tasks? > I'm currently building out to gtk+ and gtk+@2 on aarch64 to see how > everything goes. Efraim, I saw you had issues with net-tools-for-tests. Can you give more detail? --rwEMma7ioTxnRzrJ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEsFFZSPHn08G5gDigJkb6MLrKfwgFAln8XyUACgkQJkb6MLrK fwiIwA/+NTPeMD4WhiykuvTGiLHLrWdqlaTirYae6hEBygyZ7HxrjHiQSgVJaNgI PH7VTahUbHp9Go+eMM5UqJm1WesqrvuZA66joyLCtg6MuZ4Wi3S9nJqcg5EF7QW4 UgM8vKuBy46fyCnHIBWtI7syhEwG6gxzDlA6F9xvrq+7aUZW5u+/e7ZwLmBTEeBm 1A3bs1TBF9o14e9GB65WjfZPHV53tj18ojFo+YPd8rcIXz5xsaCpO7ZjE4o1DppX ip/+PZNng4NtgzPurWf5ZDUyigjt0Rx4LDA8l1xQMtBQv/gvR/cB5jRH6tnLlURB UrROPOdPaS0dfIK/+qVMGqxkCTx4yGQTrKX1fv7jizYOOJik3mUNhTTEjiTDC9o5 d3/8J2GFYMZTEODuNJRuK0MiMDS9EHZ1+g0+Xrzq9oTXCtXm1YDgaOoWOB9B4Q4i NKv76X8pLA/a5Svq1hQYrB8nymG7uBxk1IqWI+8+gQmqmGza1mu6SlXJJFTg8hXP srDHgLbXQCcfd8MhBdjrrwjaU89HW3BDtjbDzRUV+0q9VlzLqeYDNz4TJId7gv47 lDBH9Xxdwovucs19yB+eqXGQK3qbBBYxe6TPD8w+ovYrRzBdJ444EeOPNuZIyaYk aFwEOpDvvtcdUlL2tzuJt92fVR3EF5RK/2bG/ijOzCZsgBu8IMc= =uKen -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --rwEMma7ioTxnRzrJ--