From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christopher Baines Subject: Re: 'core-updates' status Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2017 12:30:47 +0100 Message-ID: <20170822123047.213b2934@cbaines.net> References: <87inhky3g2.fsf@fastmail.com> <20170819095848.271df40d@cbaines.net> <87lgmcc862.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; boundary="Sig_/fwhY7KZHoOP7QmrAL.1yOa="; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55346) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dk7Oa-00025Q-Gp for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Aug 2017 07:30:57 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dk7OX-0002Cx-Cc for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Aug 2017 07:30:56 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87lgmcc862.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?B?Q291cnTDqHM=?= Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org --Sig_/fwhY7KZHoOP7QmrAL.1yOa= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 22 Aug 2017 10:34:45 +0200 ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) wrote: > Christopher Baines skribis: >=20 > > On Fri, 18 Aug 2017 23:24:29 +0200 > > Marius Bakke wrote: > > =20 > >> 'core-updates' has finished building on x86_64 and i686. There > >> are a few failing packages still, but nothing too scary. Please > >> try to fix some if you can! > >>=20 > >> https://hydra.gnu.org/eval/109753?full=3D1&compare=3Dmaster#tabs-now-f= ail =20 > > > > So I spotted [1] that the tailon system test is failing, but the way > > that it failed isn't included in the log. Is there a way to get at > > the log file which it generates, or, would it be good to modify the > > system tests to print out the log file when the test ends? =20 >=20 > We could print the log upon failure, indeed. >=20 > In the meantime, perhaps you can reproduce it on your machine? :-) Unfortunately not, it passes when I run it locally. I can see the test it fails on, which does involve waiting for the service to start, and it waits for up to 50 seconds, but maybe that isn't enough, it could also be a different failure though. --Sig_/fwhY7KZHoOP7QmrAL.1yOa= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQKTBAEBCgB9FiEEPonu50WOcg2XVOCyXiijOwuE9XcFAlmcFedfFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldDNF ODlFRUU3NDU4RTcyMEQ5NzU0RTBCMjVFMjhBMzNCMEI4NEY1NzcACgkQXiijOwuE 9Xda8A/+POjlv98q4fpy8b7wVGJo6riNj4a+fPzAzZC/IBHFisM6Co8HnwhXXIUw 2a2OpKUE8yeJiJtObBL2pejOxpHJDZqh5JQo/yB0Zwuo1qJen/5VmfhLgPgpyDh2 RbBH2fPAwCyhk5BhkUHijnPgwzzRMiQMU0IkyQEEMbtEM+iLf3rode49JQfvd9+v VugFgezMga252sfs3FlTTksctdkxrpmJ9Q4evTBZoRjSkp/awkY3lseau14kMJMx zxvSyV93FDAS0/GLQylH9D2SMWTFByKGSnH9vRwWnqiuzBPrg+tkBfdG78btDAoD qFZeT9fDhCYV/8M1/60GCp08LfVOZcIJYv3YH/ASs555gSz5Y3jgMVGnyA9PjEeG I/CRzuQ7bhnZY0BQbkOw+SbJ1KKAoiUH50JVK/whBGJLk9Vr+0Ksx9GAoCmXtfte J7EieE47Mzfm1TAHzNgjLwuJ6fdVvVN2/joOW7rNQTyq4BKd5zX4tEPd5M3B1Ex+ BH0N8WSbjG1a8IkExiX/HpL3ALBD22b+YH64XEEyonYBSA3fnitzXYTTF+lMFogT E2mtlbl7m+s5pW2H6jtHFQ/hFl09fXtMrmV1Us9p7/sUhBMFsS/m9FksdGzFaO/P TtcM5vZ+Fqtj6ziQe5jmryV43fFRdd3HjLvA/59Bg0dT9GxEWUg= =zipU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/fwhY7KZHoOP7QmrAL.1yOa=--