From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: git cannot be built Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2017 16:10:26 -0400 Message-ID: <20170809201026.GA17162@jasmine.lan> References: <87wp6fnzmh.fsf@elephly.net> <877eyds7nj.fsf@netris.org> <87efslnp78.fsf@elephly.net> <878tisedbc.fsf@netris.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="1yeeQ81UyVL57Vl7" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45165) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dfXQg-0003F6-I4 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Aug 2017 16:18:11 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dfXQd-0005Ld-DD for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Aug 2017 16:18:10 -0400 Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:44327) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dfXQd-0005L2-0W for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Aug 2017 16:18:07 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <878tisedbc.fsf@netris.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Mark H Weaver Cc: guix-devel --1yeeQ81UyVL57Vl7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Aug 09, 2017 at 03:44:23PM -0400, Mark H Weaver wrote: > Ricardo Wurmus writes: >=20 > > Mark H Weaver writes: > > > >> Ricardo Wurmus writes: > >> > >>> Commit 7f171fdaadb15bb1b313b25e9be3d1988b0f650f broke git for me. I > >>> cannot build it from source because one of the many tests appears to > >>> fail. > >>> > >>> This is on x86_64. I have not tried this on other architectures. > >> > >> FWIW, it built successfully on my x86_64 GuixSD system. I've > >> transitioned to building everything locally. > > > > It also worked on my i686 machine, but it failed repeatedly on my x200s. >=20 > I built it on a Thinkpad X200. Perhaps I got lucky. Also, it case it's > relevant, I've been using linux-libre@4.9 with selected patches from > Debian. Anecdata: It failed once on my Debian x230, which is using the 4.12 kernel series (compiled myself). It's passed three times since then. --1yeeQ81UyVL57Vl7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEsFFZSPHn08G5gDigJkb6MLrKfwgFAlmLbDIACgkQJkb6MLrK fwgi2w//XeKil6N06nul1n07pbTsMFadmQKlLIGWDqjwYOpVKH3mKBSaLPLzHI0c 1l+wcB7bfZ1delCmqvA8DEyGeznczwocuzCvUPRMnFsUYdQGR/Ne0dN7lwp7JIlV fZlk13+vWCKj1i2UuccGyk2aEBe8yyevFc0HkzjWA2y9xc79Rr4H5tyeV66k21xs O5PTX6kGwDMim1JzR3LUMN1IMQO8aRN+yBb/9vpXBxbEpheZt6z6z0JMz3U78KRU c5lYPsJ+Euk0mfztm+nP9yKzTf8OlsUxxD6m0HoD+JVb0rwTdDpJsDKirF3ZjrZg dlUkKJYN4D6HMclqVATw7hWJehfDN4oaRebmjYlyjUW1LtLhob3HMx4a3QZUvYRO Bar+djo1Gjyd2AX7VOcxobKFt6gjBSKxkvPXGBX/dZSXw32S/KxCKMxNjb4WprGq Q3mAOWDDTLK3UVPdaZCLhPNzu7G83phKgqxWPSrRzolpGpW9o0uDZcLHxjwkyOzy LE7GQoHKgAxNK2DIqYlliopB+FfPQdJw0nxfnXN+pspip+81c7sTErKiw+0RNMQb puqv/48ZmZ0dBo/Psn7C0PUEW5vebMJXdi3GV3aQJew7vk+u/1IYrfrENgDVpGWL yywM7xQw7UyYAWN4IRE410Eqmx2CL0JLdUpLQgXNwVk6VqpAANA= =YDJs -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --1yeeQ81UyVL57Vl7--