From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ng0 Subject: Re: NetworkManager instead of =?utf-8?Q?Wi?= =?utf-8?B?Y2QgaW4g4oCYJWRlc2t0b3Atc2VydmljZXPigJk/?= Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2017 14:59:03 +0000 Message-ID: <20170730145903.3oloxj3ac4l6vilv@abyayala> References: <87iniaf06l.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="jjz4qo6ghtmm2tkx" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34009) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dbpgg-0008JG-8P for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Jul 2017 10:59:23 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dbpgf-0003M4-9G for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Jul 2017 10:59:22 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87iniaf06l.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: guix-devel --jjz4qo6ghtmm2tkx Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Ludovic Court=C3=A8s transcribed 0.6K bytes: > Hello Guix! >=20 > Shouldn=E2=80=99t we replace Wicd with NetworkManager in =E2=80=98%deskto= p-services=E2=80=99? >=20 > I=E2=80=99ve given it a try on a GuixSD GNOME installation and it appears= to > work well, and it=E2=80=99s obviously well-integrated with GNOME, whereas= Wicd > is a bit hidden (one has to know what to look for) and =E2=80=9Cforeign.= =E2=80=9D >=20 > Thoughts? >=20 > Now, as someone who doesn=E2=80=99t use GNOME, I wonder if NM would work = well > for me. Last time I tried it=E2=80=99s CLI was too low-level to be usabl= e, and > I don=E2=80=99t remember seeing a curses interface. Suggestions? >=20 > Thanks, > Ludo=E2=80=99. When I used it with GNOME it was okay. But as I personally don't really use GNOME and fancy integration doesn't help me: Don't we have nm-curses? or is that a separate package? --=20 ng0 GnuPG: A88C8ADD129828D7EAC02E52E22F9BBFEE348588 GnuPG: https://n0is.noblogs.org/my-keys https://www.infotropique.org https://krosos.org --jjz4qo6ghtmm2tkx Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEqIyK3RKYKNfqwC5S4i+bv+40hYgFAll99DYACgkQ4i+bv+40 hYjfvA//YxMHWi0nHgZS4B5sESqcDE7CdcrsGixt6MnQejLlnIxeCALn4bsDEEaZ 2Rt0LlQaVTL0p4ZRqx5wLZw9Bty41do4xQkhgfJiVFH3GhEf68OJdr0cGC5Fp/3L gocqEQx4zl7UQeYhCmKJfqF1CSrdx4yucwo6wQvXfKiZmpmxGvSps7AJ88uPiESY wsuNKkx/lo/GheqVZmBzv2g3I983wa28oxLB5kMSJYQqTZ8E2ic29Xe5JMlm/vRw 8ZdJoE6rv8VPA+wim/esJKoBJ7mNH5FfVAriZpemjijCWnvq5cMJXdnMFg3miS/C Rn8OpGrCAX+SaeOH5aMXrWRpBEeeeyY9w0OhGlac3RL9IyzQsBWDIjmOsmBLwjDb 3ThoC6HinVydMJoUYCJwt4PDie3rQKbUScfEnRNkXMcsJxY67OhT2FJLuT/5l7xq 6S1JNW4sYUivn+vHX9c9qnrk8EBEawg6MjZgqnuwhl5uETvVmf9Iqt70LjdliHg+ h5cS/6LuV5Zg1f1Bt5s3TX2yb4hTKL2ZA5uW7SXsOfbDoD+MeNWWHxCkWqgfn83d l+v/RJPe7iOOr/uNIxsi9aUzpe4hw6xdSlBax+FGXFpu8x71UyRzQWyI6Cki8pIi pRWDgNk8TElO5KfDekl9ikMK4qmRyXDFbd0oAB1h9Tdp5Lb9B6k= =A6VZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --jjz4qo6ghtmm2tkx--