From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: compiling guix is too slow? Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2017 22:56:48 -0400 Message-ID: <20170629025648.GB16840@jasmine.lan> References: <8760ffg1nv.fsf@163.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="gatW/ieO32f1wygP" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58185) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dQPdW-0006jb-2Q for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Jun 2017 22:56:54 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dQPdS-0003ID-5S for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Jun 2017 22:56:54 -0400 Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.29]:47759) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dQPdS-0003Hx-0d for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Jun 2017 22:56:50 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <8760ffg1nv.fsf@163.com> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Feng Shu Cc: guix-guix-devel --gatW/ieO32f1wygP Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 06:58:28AM +0800, Feng Shu wrote: >=20 > Now I have found that 'guix pull' is too slow, > I need 3 hours to compile guix, is it possible to speed it ? Wow, that's really slow :( I don't know of any easy way to speed it up. Maybe you could build Guix on a faster computer and use `guix copy` to move it to this slower computer. My understanding is that Guile 2.2 traded slower compilation for faster execution of compiled programs. Hopefully the performance of the compiler will be improved in later updates to Guile. I'm curious, what machine are you using where it takes 3 hours? My slowest machine takes 100 minutes, which is also too slow, but it's much better than 3 hours. --gatW/ieO32f1wygP Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEsFFZSPHn08G5gDigJkb6MLrKfwgFAllUbHAACgkQJkb6MLrK fwiiZA//UHveci562DClJcBjskXOLV23La9E1jC3+8CAD62/u3O9ir4/3HOyOCEF GRJ/j5dcrqDuLrjaGJIeyyPWa0j6bphmL1QhFRVmv6TwOTzgne5e5yG4nkG9VI4T 4P6B3+lYu16vjbVXjowzFvSKQCKYtjMWQZy0GdfbTtH3a9ecprKJDOAWfPF2skGO bILqnOHSG6cDa80xI4iBXZxTE82lvNPKeNBecK1tJHXMdWlMX7NGBdTxmCy9aJmv BnVuwPBiZ31ERAE7NRu4lpwsFZt7PXPJCjBR3Uzp6m1ajcHwCvUIDVXffhpPkQJs Xut2RHDDqs8abpxSHk1Ytv9LGjpA8qud9b2K/AOPzcN9YD6xLEYEUGPM0lMn9pE1 v0Xg/nKLsl1a+tp/DHGzKX+VgQ6S4eFG7A76qm0p/nwpKwecEu/RFcj9D/mbxgng dSSOuyfZJ758WqMbgGimKRLTAWLhr4tMVN2pLvt4yw8mZuI5R9cXJXisE9CtmXPB zzIM4fKWodLfdutfO6KOJmxGAKGqi5gF442Mb9Xqg0+6REA196y7fz13TfqL7O7N oiq0ZXkG9J43jUoc2pxMSC+Tt3uBCW9Xx6b1mdc8QNUVZH6/qa9gzJi5TNLaTvbB UlS2dd3fbvye3vJ2J/KhqZqRw9qcVY+khddSkNCxeGNot8cAiv8= =j1C0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --gatW/ieO32f1wygP--