From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: Hydra evaluation failure Date: Wed, 17 May 2017 14:22:03 -0400 Message-ID: <20170517182203.GA4925@jasmine> References: <20170517115107.GA3299@jasmine> <87tw4jd1oh.fsf@fastmail.com> <87r2znd0up.fsf@fastmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="a8Wt8u1KmwUX3Y2C" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60368) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dB3aL-0002Yi-8p for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 17 May 2017 14:22:10 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dB3aI-0006sz-5Z for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 17 May 2017 14:22:09 -0400 Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.27]:57573) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dB3aI-0006sn-1Q for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 17 May 2017 14:22:06 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87r2znd0up.fsf@fastmail.com> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Marius Bakke Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org --a8Wt8u1KmwUX3Y2C Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 04:17:18PM +0200, Marius Bakke wrote: > Marius Bakke writes: >=20 > > Leo Famulari writes: > > > > [...] > > > >> In gnu/packages/mes.scm: > >> 79: 1 [native-inputs] > >> In unknown file: > >> ?: 0 [string-prefix? #f "x86_64-linux" ...] > >> > >> ERROR: In procedure string-prefix?: > >> ERROR: In procedure string-prefix?: Wrong type argument in position 1 = (expecting string): #f > > > > This seems to be because system is not x86_64, and > > (%current-target-system) evaluates to false. I *think* the attached > > patch solves it. >=20 > I pushed a one-liner variant. Can you try restarting the evaluation? Done! --a8Wt8u1KmwUX3Y2C Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEsFFZSPHn08G5gDigJkb6MLrKfwgFAlkclMsACgkQJkb6MLrK fwgEohAAmM0T2i76fFXg4G9qgY1HsB1yKCNZZ0NwhtuBHbnTFp0jdrczwYvtiTO8 A4esOBJO6WjUn/daE9L9EiQnPKp5qG5hYLWfp24pDl8vdzc2oLBURxUhNLrQngba 0nBSfowH4aZRyqZFhcw4mbwv/YWA1izjZffjvWyAPMPbQYuVb76AB4LgIy0egQMe VurK37dO0LMhJEnrZCOMFLv9V3tlmsDrXSmX06dOF2es+fZaSPHGhO9fGADZ7sSq uX/p2Zg1tPSkd4NYacXGeP3MXfikVRv+keaXt9huHl5qNLpSPKY6E3QkuWwy0UCP /Rmvuc8EfBBoU8Nge8wjDDTxEK+nvVfrdJZkGrYIPBbf14b0OYzcBl28HOjx9SHc jVTT5m91ELeBm2zFXJUprUS93lxhNQhhy0nbhKb+E0N6Ri9TK5IfPn1+KO5Thl5H k1oO5/KM1jTPFgMXBXmiT1HVIE8+xAMYqhUU93s1RESRthagQ7t4+Munz4UQM10P 9aGy2rcLD7D4K8Ax29s6diAjTh0m5DPn0sbTaiTzRwEafh3qHzLQNPVHFjqTDG4y xccRzDO0A+NUmD2FzufnB5UAqlzjC42m7C8/Bn+2jivxbGMKRfa9bTTLnGXcxwei n1zntAW+lA9kPyF3hTVEAqDBTPgFvMPowTTxlVlJfVslK1tBNMc= =y+ZQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --a8Wt8u1KmwUX3Y2C--