* Should I enable lua-scripting in the neomutt package?
@ 2017-04-28 11:46 ng0
2017-04-28 11:49 ` ng0
2017-04-28 14:52 ` Ricardo Wurmus
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: ng0 @ 2017-04-28 11:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: guix-devel
Recently, with the last release, neomutt introduced lua-scripting
for neomutt. It's not enabled by default because it's in a phase
where neomutt wants people to enable it, test it, and receive feedback
to improve it.
As the announcement of it points out, this can be used to write the
neomutt config in lua.
With awesome-wm, we (still) have lots of issues with lua I haven't
looked into.
Are there reasons why we might not want lua as a dependency installed?
Neomutt is delivered as feature-complete (except the databases, where
we don't enable every possible type (yet)).
Should we just wait until neomutt enables lua-scripting by default in
the build?
Tell me what you think.
--
PGP and more: https://people.pragmatique.xyz/ng0/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Should I enable lua-scripting in the neomutt package?
2017-04-28 11:46 Should I enable lua-scripting in the neomutt package? ng0
@ 2017-04-28 11:49 ` ng0
2017-04-28 14:52 ` Ricardo Wurmus
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: ng0 @ 2017-04-28 11:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: guix-devel
ng0 transcribed 0.7K bytes:
> Recently, with the last release, neomutt introduced lua-scripting
> for neomutt. It's not enabled by default because it's in a phase
> where neomutt wants people to enable it, test it, and receive feedback
> to improve it.
And because not everyone is subscribed everywhere, here is the thread:
http://mailman.neomutt.org/pipermail/neomutt-users-neomutt.org/2017-April/000126.html
> As the announcement of it points out, this can be used to write the
> neomutt config in lua.
> With awesome-wm, we (still) have lots of issues with lua I haven't
> looked into.
>
> Are there reasons why we might not want lua as a dependency installed?
> Neomutt is delivered as feature-complete (except the databases, where
> we don't enable every possible type (yet)).
> Should we just wait until neomutt enables lua-scripting by default in
> the build?
>
> Tell me what you think.
> --
> PGP and more: https://people.pragmatique.xyz/ng0/
>
--
PGP and more: https://people.pragmatique.xyz/ng0/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Should I enable lua-scripting in the neomutt package?
2017-04-28 11:46 Should I enable lua-scripting in the neomutt package? ng0
2017-04-28 11:49 ` ng0
@ 2017-04-28 14:52 ` Ricardo Wurmus
2018-02-08 18:43 ` Danny Milosavljevic
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ricardo Wurmus @ 2017-04-28 14:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ng0; +Cc: guix-devel
ng0 <contact.ng0@cryptolab.net> writes:
> Recently, with the last release, neomutt introduced lua-scripting
> for neomutt. It's not enabled by default because it's in a phase
> where neomutt wants people to enable it, test it, and receive feedback
> to improve it.
[…]
> Should we just wait until neomutt enables lua-scripting by default in
> the build?
I’d say: yes.
--
Ricardo
GPG: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6 2150 197A 5888 235F ACAC
https://elephly.net
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2018-02-08 18:43 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-04-28 11:46 Should I enable lua-scripting in the neomutt package? ng0
2017-04-28 11:49 ` ng0
2017-04-28 14:52 ` Ricardo Wurmus
2018-02-08 18:43 ` Danny Milosavljevic
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).