From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: Planning for the next release Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2017 13:52:00 -0400 Message-ID: <20170403175200.GA2866@jasmine> References: <87wpb7ym78.fsf@gnu.org> <20170403002828.GA2288@jasmine> <87pogtsxpt.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="J2SCkAp4GZ/dPZZf" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36224) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cv698-0002eu-F2 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Apr 2017 13:52:07 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cv695-0004C7-OV for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Apr 2017 13:52:06 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87pogtsxpt.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?= Cc: guix-devel --J2SCkAp4GZ/dPZZf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Apr 03, 2017 at 10:26:54AM +0200, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: > Leo Famulari skribis: > > I just pushed a tzdata update to a new staging branch. Let's build and > > merge this branch before the next release. >=20 > We can do that, but should it be a blocker? Anyway, let=E2=80=99s try an= d we=E2=80=99ll > see. >=20 > BTW: >=20 > --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- > $ ./pre-inst-env guix refresh -l -e '(@@ (gnu packages base) tzdata)' > Building the following 239 packages would ensure 442 dependent packages a= re rebuilt > --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- It used to be about ~1400 :) > I was expecting to see fewer packages depending on this one since > 3ffaec136fab017e6cc094287da207cf30f05974. Perhaps in the =E2=80=98stagin= g=E2=80=99 > branch we should migrate a few more packages to =E2=80=98tzdata-2017a=E2= =80=99? The bulk of it comes through libical, so I'm not sure we can get it under 300 rebuilds without removing tzdata from libical. Having said that, I'm not sure if libical even needs a run-time reference to tzdata. At least, we didn't notice that it was missing for ~1 year: --J2SCkAp4GZ/dPZZf Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEsFFZSPHn08G5gDigJkb6MLrKfwgFAljii7YACgkQJkb6MLrK fwhzPxAAw8jL4KRFUgijHrTNfhia9pMF8zpHlaCUpZh3FddszA0biSGSDdT4jAp6 +LLmwyMbh0jjz1oMoKqmkxLR6/wfK5XSdMe4i3/qVIcP8oGFD8EqoD2wy/fyKY+0 j21iaiM8P1h4sJNfSG8d/WXI+cEqz9XIsdyP0/rgHGLPlCMDTnzWxB2G7ivRB9Qm 4nB1LfmExreGSWt+vyrT9+S5wKKz47idGfWXl38PoFQy83tcqGMijvG4QvMgVFq/ Ky645JgF+yl3ITiBGwqHMDAU/f17okPf/x2nxNHzcEf+2Eci4m/i36lRno7BoNXd t2tqHsLi3xekqlzEOAfvlACer1iySQoqNZI+tid6w5/SVSaD0d/7t/dtY+dpMEAb EsE0nEh2T1ZkOGlupsCzuZbZ/s72F+yYaPUWUhUl+gD0hS3CODws0+dH2XyNiue7 4IVZdBrYrv5SmaQKM6wf38LMAM//NtUEPDB9IQrQ4H2DSzwvBv9NKQPp61n0Mqrp Bma5v3XT3UYiu41bC5CfLJ2JfBozRh+P/50TJFIQ1MphWd5wYxBu98BrOwXWGTFI WEJ2JMJuec6CbvC4U2M76dsKGgf8oQDPnsDkrkatXIqIXCH16b8ZIPUrB+yi2D9N vPAbPH8zNau9/ylmvIakVWBvHWVOo/OPPzVcldbdmR2AHddAtLc= =gifL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --J2SCkAp4GZ/dPZZf--