From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: John Darrington Subject: Re: Mass-packaging of 300 KDE application prepared - Help required Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2017 15:21:41 +0100 Message-ID: <20170318142141.GA16682@jocasta.intra> References: <58382A5D.40403@crazy-compilers.com> <58CA6E7B.30500@crazy-compilers.com> <87wpbm4qre.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="C7zPtVaVf+AK4Oqc" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52122) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cpFEv-0001qP-SS for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Mar 2017 10:21:54 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cpFEu-0006Ni-Sf for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Mar 2017 10:21:53 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87wpbm4qre.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Ludovic Court??s Cc: guix-devel --C7zPtVaVf+AK4Oqc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 03:13:25PM +0100, Ludovic Court??s wrote: Hi Hartmut, =20 Hartmut Goebel skribis: =20 > as promised earlier, I prepared a repository inclusing patches for m= ore > than 300 KDE packages. I will not have time to work on them, though. > Others will need to implement the packages based on this preperation= s. =20 [...] =20 > The repository can be found at > , detailed description= on > how to work with it is available ins the README there. If you have a= ny > enhancement requests, please let me know. =20 Woow, impressive piece of work! =20 Thomas Danckaert is visibly interested in KDE ;-), so either Thomas or others will cherry-pick from your repo. =20 I suggest that 300 packages is too much for one person to do. So if there is going to be a joint effort at this I suggest that somehow we decide in advance which packages are done by whom. I'm not sure how best to divide them up, since the lower dependencies will = have to be done first. J' =20 --=20 Avoid eavesdropping. Send strong encrypted email. PGP Public key ID: 1024D/2DE827B3=20 fingerprint =3D 8797 A26D 0854 2EAB 0285 A290 8A67 719C 2DE8 27B3 See http://sks-keyservers.net or any PGP keyserver for public key. --C7zPtVaVf+AK4Oqc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEARECAAYFAljNQnUACgkQimdxnC3oJ7PT7QCfSGqDT7SjoAuluJtw8fm98M+m 8gEAnAiw7QLmqwegoUAsxzX6y83kbKHB =uEnb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --C7zPtVaVf+AK4Oqc--