From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: John Darrington Subject: Re: grammar usage (was: Re: [PATCH 4/4] services: openssh: Add 'subsystems' option.) Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2017 18:50:15 +0100 Message-ID: <20170317175015.GA30584@jocasta.intra> References: <20170220235355.29115-5-clement@lassieur.org> <20170302084448.2ff6ce96@scratchpost.org> <87fuivxukg.fsf@lassieur.org> <20170305145026.zgoayn46kvpz5ksy@abyayala> <20170307214959.16038114@scratchpost.org> <87r3284x8s.fsf@lassieur.org> <87h92t1qts.fsf@gnu.org> <20170316204527.lnkgc2vot4uqk633@abyayala> <20170317053620.GA16076@jocasta.intra> <0df3b956-380c-c773-afa2-097172b06e19@tobias.gr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="TB36FDmn/VVEgNH/" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44067) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cow19-0003FE-Ca for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Mar 2017 13:50:24 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cow15-0002g1-GS for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Mar 2017 13:50:23 -0400 Received: from de.cellform.com ([88.217.224.109]:32981 helo=jocasta.intra) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cow15-0002fr-7t for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Mar 2017 13:50:19 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <0df3b956-380c-c773-afa2-097172b06e19@tobias.gr> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org --TB36FDmn/VVEgNH/ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 05:13:49PM +0100, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice wrote: No. =20 John, I find you very rude in this thread. Please stop dismissing as ???reproachful, judgemental, censorious, or sanctimonious??? anyone who dares correct your unsolicited incorrections. Yelling ???DON'T BRING IT UP??? when they address your behaviour isn't helping your case either. I would point out that I did not raise this issue. I have taken great pain= s to=20 avoid rudeness in this thread. Suggesting that a person does not raise a t= opic, orthogonal to guix, if it is likely to produce a response that annoys him/= her is entirely appropriate. =20 > but most linguists, and many orators (the president of the Free=20 > Software Foundation being one of them) consider this to be a misuse= =20 > of the English language and refuse to (mis)use these words for such > a purpose. =20 They then promptly, disingenuously, linguistically, and politically misuse English in order to thrust masculinity upon people against their will, or by default.=20 =20 So most linguists do that do they? If you have evidence to back this up, t= hen please present it. If you cannot, the be aware there are terms for people= =20 who display intolerant or prejudical attitudes such as this in the absence of supporting evidence. J' --=20 Avoid eavesdropping. Send strong encrypted email. PGP Public key ID: 1024D/2DE827B3=20 fingerprint =3D 8797 A26D 0854 2EAB 0285 A290 8A67 719C 2DE8 27B3 See http://sks-keyservers.net or any PGP keyserver for public key. --TB36FDmn/VVEgNH/ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEARECAAYFAljMIdcACgkQimdxnC3oJ7P6FACeLTcucgoT+ol3OGVknE2vQinF IDcAn2X1iZ3VSHdEY8JPJHlyJKmbo5I+ =tRJM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --TB36FDmn/VVEgNH/--