From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] services: openssh: Add 'subsystems' option. Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2017 12:21:31 -0400 Message-ID: <20170317162131.GA4354@jasmine> References: <20170220235355.29115-1-clement@lassieur.org> <20170220235355.29115-5-clement@lassieur.org> <20170302084448.2ff6ce96@scratchpost.org> <87fuivxukg.fsf@lassieur.org> <20170305145026.zgoayn46kvpz5ksy@abyayala> <20170307214959.16038114@scratchpost.org> <87r3284x8s.fsf@lassieur.org> <87h92t1qts.fsf@gnu.org> <20170316204527.lnkgc2vot4uqk633@abyayala> <20170317053620.GA16076@jocasta.intra> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="dDRMvlgZJXvWKvBx" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50590) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1coudH-0000be-7n for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Mar 2017 12:21:40 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1coudD-0003Xb-7X for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Mar 2017 12:21:39 -0400 Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:41105) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1coudC-0003Wp-PL for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Mar 2017 12:21:35 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170317053620.GA16076@jocasta.intra> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: John Darrington Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org --dDRMvlgZJXvWKvBx Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 06:36:20AM +0100, John Darrington wrote: > On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 08:45:27PM +0000, ng0 wrote: >=20 > ps Cl??ment: 'them'/'they' are pronouns if you don't know the gender= and/or > prefered pronoun of a person :) >=20 >=20 > ... according to some. - but most linguists, and many orators (the presi= dent of=20 > the Free Software Foundation being one of them) consider this to be a mis= use of=20 > the English language and refuse to (mis)use these words for such a purpos= e. As a native USA English speaker, I think this usage is fine, and widely accepted by speakers, at least in this country. There are some cases where it sounds a little clunky, but we don't have other words for this use case that enjoy wider common usage. --dDRMvlgZJXvWKvBx Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEsFFZSPHn08G5gDigJkb6MLrKfwgFAljMDQcACgkQJkb6MLrK fwjbrhAAvndJOCPp5yFF883wQ5ALmKyn1VL6p/3tDYqGA0IAZQfVMC+ZHRzf1e3G LLal/lQY6M1TVJ1lXEAZ5CtQPuAhs2ATksAzzZAo3qOH3QbDkxK4hyYPnbXw7Dus gQDInz9pxCEUIMzreFdFE3koc0g4a7FpaGCle2cIdog/tqIubl+LM/sQHNoLwEFO QBfMlI/Bh7b4EW4LOTu18Chn1iInY3c2hVvEXVNbvshbUlQPsbQKMPgOBFVHzS18 Rb7mw126WrccpaZTx528IU2+8HJg8hE6C6gAgnntoi4s7qH/5GXWt0dsvQQdHv5t ZkmtkU3T16lVThBHvgtkGiHlzaWgxUaU0Niss/VOILQZ6oLFh+oF6hmmvnN9FvRw LxZ1ysQCIzuCGeeRo8B31j/JSNk7D8sQT/wwaRBkHCTkJIuHLlJvH1COVGnG8P5Z uySZbdHDGU9bOIFN1dSMNzuEA26t5YNPVi5V+sukKj5/Vmt/8MDk9xEVAf28yZem MyCuUvTtQeiJBMSgdcFhLbt8mRnIG3itV3navtr2qEQAHVUJOiIIigrRbMrTJVfw UpcEt1YXi8Os4X3DwX5gnrytpidPO7vEquarZYNUszjl9pxsoVzPzDy8IlPjnDRa T3ghk7gu6bE7I9Cc6ZOGU9ckqqef7rjMTfA2FNHiXG4SIB/+LRo= =XFYL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --dDRMvlgZJXvWKvBx--