From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: =?utf-8?Q?Let=E2=80=99s_freeze_and_bui?= =?utf-8?B?bGQg4oCYY29yZS11cGRhdGVz4oCZIQ==?= Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2017 17:26:58 -0500 Message-ID: <20170306222658.GA10869@jasmine> References: <87mvdpw3b3.fsf@gnu.org> <87zihoizr4.fsf@kirby.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <87tw7wspwp.fsf@gnu.org> <87zihfwshj.fsf@kirby.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <20170221173201.GA9718@jasmine> <20170221174149.GA5944@jasmine> <87innmzrrt.fsf@gnu.org> <87lgsi60z5.fsf@kirby.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <87wpc2s9bn.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44728) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cl15u-00089m-Tl for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Mar 2017 17:27:07 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cl15q-0003tU-Kx for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Mar 2017 17:27:06 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87wpc2s9bn.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?= Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 04:39:56PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > It’s been 3 days since their message and it hasn’t happened yet, so > perhaps we should simply run autoreconf. > > Thoughts? Okay. > BTW, xorg-server is a build-time dependency of gtk+@3 (for test > purposes), which is the main reason why it has so many dependents. > Perhaps it would be fine to keep using 1.9.12 for GTK+. That way, we > can update xorg-server without rebuilding the world. Good idea. Should xorg-server-for-gtk inherit from xorg-server or be a completely separate package? Or something else?