From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Efraim Flashner Subject: Re: midnight commander package fixes, opinions wanted Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2017 11:55:27 +0200 Message-ID: <20170306095527.GA23203@macbook42.flashner.co.il> References: <20170301165841.ji65zi4rm2pypeql@abyayala> <20170301170123.37y4d36dziq6ewqo@abyayala> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="gKMricLos+KVdGMg" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60416) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ckpMi-0003nL-7V for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Mar 2017 04:55:41 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ckpMd-0005n2-DX for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Mar 2017 04:55:40 -0500 Received: from flashner.co.il ([178.62.234.194]:36030) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ckpMd-0005lw-5c for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Mar 2017 04:55:35 -0500 Received: from localhost (85.64.232.168.dynamic.barak-online.net [85.64.232.168]) by flashner.co.il (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 03055400C9 for ; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 09:55:32 +0000 (UTC) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170301170123.37y4d36dziq6ewqo@abyayala> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: guix-devel@gnu.org --gKMricLos+KVdGMg Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 05:01:23PM +0000, ng0 wrote: > On 17-03-01 16:58:41, ng0 wrote: > > Hi, > >=20 > > I already fixed some of the open issues with our package of 'mc'. > >=20 > > I think people will expect features to just work and not being broken > > (as they are right now). > > My personal opinion ignored, how do you want to proceed? The vim way > > where we have $package (basic, as small as it gets) and $package-full > > (with all the features you can have enabled)? > >=20 > > I'd like to hear your opionion so that I can proceed fixing mc with > > what we agreed on. > >=20 >=20 > And also your opinion, I don't know what an opionion is but it sounds > like opium combined with onion and I don't want that. >=20 I've been sitting on a patch for ranger for a while. I also couldn't decide between packaging just ranger or also linking in the various programs it calls. I think that if mc would use libcaca to display an image, and just installing libcaca in profile would satisfy that dependancy, then leaving it out is "not great, but acceptable". --=20 Efraim Flashner =D7=90=D7=A4=D7=A8=D7=99=D7=9D = =D7=A4=D7=9C=D7=A9=D7=A0=D7=A8 GPG key =3D A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted --gKMricLos+KVdGMg Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEkVdB/rIvpOM7bo+N9MHTkX6s7pMFAli9Mg4ACgkQ9MHTkX6s 7pOm5g/+ItMqYriw66SMiDAu4DRSLveitkCrTZu/c/2ZdN+leZVHM4+kiwEo4dvQ y4uZm3FtPz/N64YxA7jqHlI3bpFIsK/HCQxKRqtOWEX1+ryZJIEkdMF8BIXU/HhI R52mG0fLg+BsWNEp7oNVqRX8JTp8FM7etKVVldWS5HOvOt9YeAnqNg6bIUeUxlRz l6ylNiR/5Cd6mq7r51bGPfxG9Xl4vzppfuNyCw2TquXmqacTo75O2hiBPvIG9cHq b2rGs0NV/QyyV38657zmG5F/7/Pb7Inqk4WkaOOQ4Xj3GLBK6CcqrCcIK85m4ILW bXV9UQzlA5sSpzx7nayxcCrJRXAPukz7m10cION2K2N9reQA8uXnDfXEW05MBt3d aL02x3mX6L5Hvm3//L9WKYIqHg4tKbgNSrZMp4W1tTAC3Yft7BsKTwvKgNubDIVP 298RfDCTlcwmQKlHnqn2BWydqEyo3t5dF3tei/LayBWu/6M2xKrERMh2PKLNoEek zJMQKA7NA45MGNhrGKrEJ6WxmD/Axgk4GBtKp9cWL/pKXhATRbCtke1QF0hm4Nhg vZQq5nF2VHtVIgvLl2UNrNr3aFL8WTMwh4ovln32j93ohQo4pfm6wTKqsmZLXwg7 a83xlauV92CaH8gbAuUAYuGpWkXBHSFcrL34zgNb2Xx1v06ZdO4= =FE+w -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --gKMricLos+KVdGMg--