From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: John Darrington Subject: Re: gnu-patches back log Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2017 14:14:34 +0100 Message-ID: <20170301131434.GA17852@jocasta.intra> References: <87inof5w20.fsf@dustycloud.org> <20170226111029.GA19050@mail.thebird.nl> <87poi4rd1m.fsf@dustycloud.org> <20170228062531.GA647@mail.thebird.nl> <20170301061625.GA11982@jasmine> <20170301081739.GA10117@mail.thebird.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="n8g4imXOkfNTN/H1" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41659) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cj45j-0004hh-Fk for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Mar 2017 08:14:52 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cj45f-0008AS-E4 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Mar 2017 08:14:51 -0500 Received: from de.cellform.com ([88.217.224.109]:60235 helo=jocasta.intra) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cj45f-00089q-5R for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Mar 2017 08:14:47 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170301081739.GA10117@mail.thebird.nl> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Pjotr Prins Cc: guix-devel --n8g4imXOkfNTN/H1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 08:17:39AM +0000, Pjotr Prins wrote: I would like to ask the Guix mailing list members whether it is *acceptable* that a good looking patch has not been touched for two weeks. Like this one =20 https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D25725 =20 Looks to me like it could go right in, even if it has no tests. And I bet it was linted.=20 =20 I.e., LGTM, and apologies for the submitter. It is just embarrassing and as a project we can do better *together*. If two weeks is acceptable, will 4 weeks be acceptable? Where do we draw the line? =20 We already have a policy that if nobody comments on a patch the submitter may commit it after two weeks. Silence gives consent! --=20 Avoid eavesdropping. Send strong encrypted email. PGP Public key ID: 1024D/2DE827B3=20 fingerprint =3D 8797 A26D 0854 2EAB 0285 A290 8A67 719C 2DE8 27B3 See http://sks-keyservers.net or any PGP keyserver for public key. --n8g4imXOkfNTN/H1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEARECAAYFAli2yToACgkQimdxnC3oJ7ONuQCggOJsL7pxuH89FEVAsi2ngYit 3ecAnRh3iHU3M6b/06Y5nidUi+giyOn6 =uTj+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --n8g4imXOkfNTN/H1--