* [PATCH] gnu: Add gnushogi and xshogi
@ 2017-02-22 19:15 John Darrington
2017-02-22 21:58 ` Leo Famulari
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: John Darrington @ 2017-02-22 19:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: guix-devel; +Cc: John Darrington
* gnu/packages/games.scm (gnushogi, xshogi): New variables.
---
gnu/packages/games.scm | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 43 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/games.scm b/gnu/packages/games.scm
index 1d6a12a..50315a6 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/games.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/games.scm
@@ -175,6 +175,49 @@ You may even apply photos to the faces instead of colors. The game is
scriptable with Guile.")
(license license:gpl3+)))
+(define-public gnushogi
+ (package
+ (name "gnushogi")
+ (version "1.4.2")
+ (source
+ (origin
+ (method url-fetch)
+ (uri (string-append "mirror://gnu/gnushogi/gnushogi-"
+ version ".tar.gz"))
+ (sha256
+ (base32
+ "0a9bsl2nbnb138lq0h14jfc5xvz7hpb2bcsj4mjn6g1hcsl4ik0y"))))
+ (arguments `(#:tests? #f)) ;; No check target.
+ (build-system gnu-build-system)
+ (home-page "http://www.gnu.org/software/gnushogi/")
+ (synopsis "The game of Shogi (Japanese chess)")
+ (description "GNU Shogi is a program that plays the game Shogi (Japanese
+Chess). It is similar to standard chess but this variant is far more complicated.")
+ (license license:gpl3+)))
+
+(define-public xshogi
+ (package
+ (name "xshogi")
+ (version "1.4.2")
+ (source
+ (origin
+ (method url-fetch)
+ (uri (string-append "mirror://gnu/gnushogi/xshogi-"
+ version ".tar.gz"))
+ (sha256
+ (base32
+ "1dns0nhymak44by18sv48m4xb2skiwbi2i3nb9hl6w9iwd2i2brf"))))
+ (build-system gnu-build-system)
+ (inputs
+ `(("libxaw" ,libxaw)
+ ("libxt" ,libxt)))
+ (home-page "http://www.gnu.org/software/gnushogi/")
+ (synopsis "User interface for @code{gnushogi}")
+ (description "A graphical user interface for the package @code{gnushogi}.")
+ ;; Contains a copy of GPLv3 but the licence notices simply
+ ;; state "GNU General Public Licence" without specifying a version.
+ (license license:gpl1+)))
+
(define-public abbaye
(package
(name "abbaye")
--
2.1.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add gnushogi and xshogi
2017-02-22 19:15 [PATCH] gnu: Add gnushogi and xshogi John Darrington
@ 2017-02-22 21:58 ` Leo Famulari
2017-02-23 5:19 ` John Darrington
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Leo Famulari @ 2017-02-22 21:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: John Darrington; +Cc: guix-devel
On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 08:15:04PM +0100, John Darrington wrote:
> * gnu/packages/games.scm (gnushogi, xshogi): New variables.
> +(define-public xshogi
[...]
> + ;; Contains a copy of GPLv3 but the licence notices simply
> + ;; state "GNU General Public Licence" without specifying a version.
> + (license license:gpl1+)))
Section 14 of the GPL says "If the Program does not specify a
version number of the GNU General Public License, you may choose any
version ever published by the Free Software Foundation."
https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html
Do we want to use version 1 of the GPL? I don't fully understand the
issues with it, but it's an unusual choice.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add gnushogi and xshogi
2017-02-22 21:58 ` Leo Famulari
@ 2017-02-23 5:19 ` John Darrington
2017-02-23 17:06 ` Leo Famulari
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: John Darrington @ 2017-02-23 5:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Leo Famulari; +Cc: guix-devel, John Darrington
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1442 bytes --]
On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 04:58:07PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote:
On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 08:15:04PM +0100, John Darrington wrote:
> * gnu/packages/games.scm (gnushogi, xshogi): New variables.
> +(define-public xshogi
[...]
> + ;; Contains a copy of GPLv3 but the licence notices simply
> + ;; state "GNU General Public Licence" without specifying a version.
> + (license license:gpl1+)))
Section 14 of the GPL says "If the Program does not specify a
version number of the GNU General Public License, you may choose any
version ever published by the Free Software Foundation."
You are correct. That is why I put gpl1+
Do we want to use version 1 of the GPL? I don't fully understand the
issues with it, but it's an unusual choice.
I don't have a strong opinion here. But there is a precedent in Guix, that
where upstream permits a package to be distributed under a choice of licences,
we simply present that choice to our users. We don't - at least I haven't seen
any instances of it - choose a particular one that suits us, unless there is a
good reason for doing that.
J'
--
Avoid eavesdropping. Send strong encrypted email.
PGP Public key ID: 1024D/2DE827B3
fingerprint = 8797 A26D 0854 2EAB 0285 A290 8A67 719C 2DE8 27B3
See http://sks-keyservers.net or any PGP keyserver for public key.
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 181 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add gnushogi and xshogi
2017-02-23 5:19 ` John Darrington
@ 2017-02-23 17:06 ` Leo Famulari
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Leo Famulari @ 2017-02-23 17:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: John Darrington; +Cc: guix-devel, John Darrington
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1384 bytes --]
On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 06:19:19AM +0100, John Darrington wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 04:58:07PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 08:15:04PM +0100, John Darrington wrote:
> > * gnu/packages/games.scm (gnushogi, xshogi): New variables.
>
> > +(define-public xshogi
>
> [...]
>
> > + ;; Contains a copy of GPLv3 but the licence notices simply
> > + ;; state "GNU General Public Licence" without specifying a version.
> > + (license license:gpl1+)))
>
> Section 14 of the GPL says "If the Program does not specify a
> version number of the GNU General Public License, you may choose any
> version ever published by the Free Software Foundation."
>
> You are correct. That is why I put gpl1+
>
> Do we want to use version 1 of the GPL? I don't fully understand the
> issues with it, but it's an unusual choice.
>
> I don't have a strong opinion here. But there is a precedent in Guix, that
> where upstream permits a package to be distributed under a choice of licences,
> we simply present that choice to our users. We don't - at least I haven't seen
> any instances of it - choose a particular one that suits us, unless there is a
> good reason for doing that.
Okay, that makes sense to me. Please do as you see fit :)
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-02-23 17:06 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-02-22 19:15 [PATCH] gnu: Add gnushogi and xshogi John Darrington
2017-02-22 21:58 ` Leo Famulari
2017-02-23 5:19 ` John Darrington
2017-02-23 17:06 ` Leo Famulari
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).