From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: GuixSD on commodity hosting platforms, hoster: IN-Berlin Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 11:42:14 -0500 Message-ID: <20170214164214.GA22529@jasmine> References: <20170209183609.5rztohnqhsleifll@wasp> <20170213214717.GA11352@jasmine> <87o9y5unti.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="T4sUOijqQbZv57TR" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49434) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cdgCF-0007yg-Ik for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2017 11:43:20 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cdgCC-0005Rx-HI for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2017 11:43:19 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87o9y5unti.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?= Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org --T4sUOijqQbZv57TR Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 10:24:57AM +0100, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: > Leo Famulari skribis: > > I'd like for someone to try this conversion themself and verify that it > > creates the same qcow2 file. >=20 > The image itself is most likely not bit-reproducible, if that=E2=80=99s w= hat you > mean (non-reproducible packages, uncontrolled file system layout, etc.) I meant that I'd like someone to try downloading the official 0.12.0 x86_64-linux installer image that Ricardo released and attempt the image format conversion. If they get the same result, then it removes me from the chain of people that Serveraptor users have to trust. Instead, they'd trust Serveraptor to offer them the same image that I'm providing from my site. > > If it does, then we can ask Serveraptor to make it available for testing > > on their platform. >=20 > That would be great! >=20 > For these use cases, I wonder if it makes sense to provide the > installation image. Wouldn=E2=80=99t it be more convenient if we provide= d, say, > the =E2=80=9Cbare-bones=E2=80=9D image or a variant thereof? That way, a= s a user, you > could directly use it as-is, or just run =E2=80=98reconfigure=E2=80=99 in= it. Okay, I'll wait a bit for someone to try to the conversion. At the same time, I'll ask Serveraptor what makes more sense for their platform. --T4sUOijqQbZv57TR Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEsFFZSPHn08G5gDigJkb6MLrKfwgFAlijM2IACgkQJkb6MLrK fwiW5BAAyTGqTcE7RfG78vApSMKB2uzcflEs4yRsclMH9oQzdb2KBWo6B6SbSqxy i+T/xm+DyNmE8Kjcx8WsUCpJIfcI/47q3QqqXDZNJ6A4IPogvv/rzHYU0gj7KDZq BefmbJqJo8wNeUpfi9WbohwSsxmnaCYioay2zU95nmfDQbDJ2dy7Wn8GoHm1zSss R9pUxkVywsFXegWBxdmCvEj2mS02UuWoEEBYrLnypINaWD4RYQ7OSWEeo2Gd0q12 bt1Kl1Jt1xbHAmtqtQZMScUKuOsFDS8h7tPKxdKtRcd0zRUjrMvOA5nB0RmdL1LY 8u2PvHVS+x9RvCnMCvpQWiQTU1kW0C0HNl3rIB3SpT55/8vgkmu6sRKiSLTWsxro eV22CZEdCZQkRBMNInJtLsYgsWNjsbWGmr6prXscvw191NlPETfcDQKNq2ibdOb5 hGMDevjxhjHWViT6BH+J/fimQRtk/iY+kkiD6SDKVFMd+ZWt4pGOH4XSZF5nvaMv ZGRxV1GrKqabRL0e1P5lU2BRx8v5Y5hu+GB7tiA1tn1zjL4yx33VIDzN8iOMlhqy 1rnhdVmP3DUMOQsmv8emu+hgmlsclp/6kEd56v57CqXqtKilwFuzKrGgouy4GQam YqUp+jQwU53E+ei0eNwnZQDGJeQCDLi+wGehl1iw3rSJbbODu/E= =pwMd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --T4sUOijqQbZv57TR--