From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: Auditing CPE names Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2017 10:38:11 -0500 Message-ID: <20170212153811.GA18631@jasmine> References: <20170211195346.GA10400@jasmine> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="fUYQa+Pmc3FrFX/N" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46043) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ccwEK-0007iL-C1 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Feb 2017 10:38:25 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ccwEH-0001JV-AS for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Feb 2017 10:38:24 -0500 Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]:49712) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ccwEH-0001IV-1b for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Feb 2017 10:38:21 -0500 Received: from localhost (c-73-188-17-148.hsd1.pa.comcast.net [73.188.17.148]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id CD1067E06B for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2017 10:38:15 -0500 (EST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170211195346.GA10400@jasmine> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: guix-devel@gnu.org --fUYQa+Pmc3FrFX/N Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 02:53:46PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote: > It's important to name the package in accordance with the CPE or set > the cpe-name property, or else `guix lint -c cve` won't work for that > package. In commit 84b60a7cdfc (gnu: lcms: Fix an out-of-bounds read.) I tried to set the cpe-name but couldn't get it to work, and then I forgot to remove it from the commit message before pushing. Anyways, I still can't get it to work after trying again today. This package should be reported as vulnerable to CVE-2016-10165. The CVE database for 2016 includes this line in the entry for that CVE: But when setting the cpe-name to little_cms_color_engine, the linter still doesn't report the vulnerability. Any ideas? --fUYQa+Pmc3FrFX/N Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEsFFZSPHn08G5gDigJkb6MLrKfwgFAliggWMACgkQJkb6MLrK fwgYXQ//dNtN/ce9AySOS1Dsnws9TZQZCiiZOiItgRBJE7xO84+c5GYjNYl38XXH +Z9/Y7eZNV5yzrJrz+QCVGKF4yeZTcIa9JLkvGDskJYDgFc5MyDbiEackxidGXu1 FD1f8r7ktCktezWMlqAtU1SlDEDdzGQ5rvTzLNvTB+Da7k22L/fPXHsWIrec8jxe 2iBwHNGLa6zniVVgqnrggCDZFaJqwqKOAu6Vc/9l2AKZnbKE5oRxIhOgFwC0wjsD CwNMNcTHyNEBrTy3l58kTYTtQiN9Q+TDyQ/Pn2t/0jyOZwwjWU/9HbAiRP0JkEEa 7pyIjiujmdXfB5ugXjCmoS2EiXGm+oS0iTOYQRIwkK5C/C4YHQoQdpBzHCnDq2NG ZCwA0mWfQbl98JqNH73Tt6LvKbeVhJSq2KqEFYCv5slNXJ8br4J2A+rmtifn3A6T R92MOerkkm92VqpzoDxnCdrKHFI5aM4bkm4c5+nPVQUgjpgO+kxqnkV129svHanI dxkC+CnQO/jSt6QA6j27dx2DjiSzY+PaWckAd/UuZbDUeyww8hXv5uEVwLlzN1uj f5KOzAdP5Jp4vweScm4FH7ziYztQXZEoWNVP61snKA2tJvtBcOmbmIoiZGVP1aXi hUKw5xL1Dw5+2LeJ/UeNCaaTBHFtuxcSxVZDd2lxUqTquLqYPLo= =mbIg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --fUYQa+Pmc3FrFX/N--