From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: Shadow -> 4.4 Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2017 15:28:22 -0500 Message-ID: <20170211202822.GA11831@jasmine> References: <20170119200636.2767-1-contact.ng0@cryptolab.net> <20170120051657.GA27443@jasmine> <87o9z2vvte.fsf@wasp.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <20170211184723.GA8411@jasmine> <20170211194807.wxxsq4z3jqyrsv5t@wasp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51520) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cceHV-0005Sx-PZ for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Feb 2017 15:28:30 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cceHR-0000OR-SI for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Feb 2017 15:28:29 -0500 Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]:46378) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cceHR-0000OG-Nk for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Feb 2017 15:28:25 -0500 Received: from localhost (c-73-188-17-148.hsd1.pa.comcast.net [73.188.17.148]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 808327E0E7 for ; Sat, 11 Feb 2017 15:28:23 -0500 (EST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170211194807.wxxsq4z3jqyrsv5t@wasp> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: guix-devel@gnu.org On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 07:48:07PM +0000, ng0 wrote: > Are there any reasons _against_ configuring 'shadow' with SELinux > support? I'm not that familiar with SELinux, so I can't say one way or the other. There were some scattered discussions about SELinux in GuixSD at FOSDEM, but I'm not sure if we drew any conclusions or not.