From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: Tcpdump security update Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2017 15:51:59 -0500 Message-ID: <20170130205159.GB28332@jasmine> References: <20170130200302.GA27562@jasmine> <87y3xsz4l3.fsf@kirby.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="FCuugMFkClbJLl1L" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59544) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cYIvl-0002XW-5D for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Jan 2017 15:52:06 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cYIvi-0005A6-3a for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Jan 2017 15:52:05 -0500 Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:52446) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cYIvh-00059t-Tr for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Jan 2017 15:52:02 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87y3xsz4l3.fsf@kirby.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Marius Bakke Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org --FCuugMFkClbJLl1L Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 09:16:08PM +0100, Marius Bakke wrote: >=20 > Oops, missed a little detail: >=20 > Leo Famulari writes: > > (source (origin > > (method url-fetch) > > - (uri (string-append "http://www.tcpdump.org/release/tcpd= ump-" > > - version ".tar.gz")) > > + (uri > > + (list > > + (string-append "http://http.debian.net/debian/pool= /main/t/" > > + name "/" name "_" version ".orig.t= ar.gz") > > + (string-append "http://www.tcpdump.org/release/tcp= dump-" > > + version ".tar.gz"))) >=20 > Perhaps a (file-name) field should be added here, since the two URLs > provide different file names? Thank you for the good suggestions and the quick review! Pushed as af7d72b16c7652e9ddc3c441017de5c9bb9205f2 --FCuugMFkClbJLl1L Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEsFFZSPHn08G5gDigJkb6MLrKfwgFAliPp28ACgkQJkb6MLrK fwi/2xAAw/9uZaWbu8HuT1j0ai0nuXUTyzW1WEPwD92OzX8AH1TVZaUdAtOdyDw9 9Y4e/WLeKjQlzdHTEgutyegmwAVIByEiiz5K/NWqOMuFp8Z7HRlzAZRMtJ9RY96t q/YTcSmlO8jo5jhuB/KiMPde5cRGU5BkWUnxLc3cup6bi/SA2YzJRZjbDfXDxTD7 x9zmPME0qca5rYCBQflL39JQ3CC1D/zkcSVd7BvVvqEG4KI02sLowIQL09B7ULpa AmpEOZXk5nyp3Sq/woqxJ2CsO1/ek5RdxITFjs2l+Kge5Xl8oOLN5ROj4jDzvp5L dY55wgbA+qTSPkqZ+OVTADcFMhOiVbOmjkk0f0Sq5T8q9ttWoM8VY3pM5qkGc9pb PObktImzFF1+0dMilDUjVY3BIu6qEU/9gt5jQQ35jrkDqjemChCS9sZw1d3sme8I x0kQpJQwVcGkmeWDsSoJ9CxtCd6J0lToycseU0d+NJRdyzTgvNq6O92Yn/zLMI4I RN/q8VjE/MNUS2aV3uuHg6Z6F24aFlrxVSAznAqV+ZfNss17slK6fIrMc1vkNBvH YAkn1i4QKDcIll3tZpcLOxc0NXhnFBiaaCXWXyF2e0TOlWzCcvaHGjIy04x/Y1ZK fu2oyKN2fNppQjmAui/yh26IpqdxeyIKMkt4F3UYZRZdUqLKE+U= =uhvD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --FCuugMFkClbJLl1L--