From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: Hardening (was: Re: tor: update to 0.2.9.9) Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2017 16:32:59 -0500 Message-ID: <20170124213259.GA17982@jasmine> References: <20170124111934.16080-1-contact.ng0@cryptolab.net> <20170124190726.GB6110@jasmine> <87bmuw2n3j.fsf@wasp.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <20170124210233.GB30771@jasmine> <878tq02mij.fsf@wasp.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <8760l42m2o.fsf@wasp.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54760) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cW8iA-0007vO-Is for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Jan 2017 16:33:08 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cW8i5-0005Aa-Mr for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Jan 2017 16:33:06 -0500 Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:39676) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cW8i5-0005AD-Hb for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Jan 2017 16:33:01 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <8760l42m2o.fsf@wasp.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: ng0 Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 09:18:55PM +0000, ng0 wrote: > ng0 writes: > > Leo Famulari writes: > >>> It would be great to see some movement on this during this > >>> year. I volunteer to help with it, though I don't have as much > >>> experience with SELinux (and only basic experience with > >>> GrSecurity without a modular kernel like GuixSD uses). > >> > >> Yes, this effort needs a champion. > > No, I would say this needs an effort of more than one person. At > best a team of people who either are willing to learn about > system hardening or already know enough, maybe even a combination > of both to share knowledge :) Sure, the more people the better. But so far, not a single person has begun working on it, so I'd be happy with just one.