From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: audacity: Update to 2.1.2. Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2017 16:54:58 -0500 Message-ID: <20170113215458.GA478@jasmine> References: <87d1ft1dux.fsf@openmailbox.org> <20170111224326.GA3093@jasmine> <8760ll17kl.fsf@openmailbox.org> <20170113191824.GB30469@jasmine> <86mveuybqs.fsf@openmailbox.org> <20170113204014.GA12512@jasmine> <86inpiy7sy.fsf@openmailbox.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="5mCyUwZo2JvN/JJP" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33698) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cS9oQ-0007fZ-Ny for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Jan 2017 16:55:07 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cS9oM-0003DT-S0 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Jan 2017 16:55:06 -0500 Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.26]:57726) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cS9oM-0003D2-OB for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Jan 2017 16:55:02 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <86inpiy7sy.fsf@openmailbox.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Kei Kebreau Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org --5mCyUwZo2JvN/JJP Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 04:22:05PM -0500, Kei Kebreau wrote: > Leo Famulari writes: >=20 > > On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 02:56:59PM -0500, Kei Kebreau wrote: > >> Yes please! download.fosshub.com denies access from both of my PCs. Ve= ry > >> strange. > > > > Huh, the Guix downloader ends up with the wrong file when using the link > > to fosshub from the Audacity site, and the actual fosshub URLs contain > > expiration tokens. I guess this is why we have zero packages hosted on > > fosshub. > > > > We should use the GitHub source after all. >=20 > So should I just push the patch to master then? Yes, please :) --5mCyUwZo2JvN/JJP Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEsFFZSPHn08G5gDigJkb6MLrKfwgFAlh5TKwACgkQJkb6MLrK fwgeDw/+LWFqeVnCJO8zZB63wX6O97sciFwZ96xHDsze5mhoUF751R1ZjbjDQ7Qd 55LczkqpP1pD5RzxTYn7LX6A2MYrrxk2ERzubK898M1NfSX8jdUsE1UYgjXD5a4g CscdYHc0vZPl+CAKyLYkTrlNSnWL2qG8VGwI2v+ScnfHNJAwNEaF9cAje7BLaXwF u88G1onCwWwH/imP1NwCm1jbGnO/n3eqGqpiJcswoV3qWLoDW0Fem07AQgVZJSAA 9L324yvJCC84KHK/q3O3S4x2vpIfKWduZP1ja5tuznW3irh2/vCSry6h1i9edp5l KOhMCVwkxZrbrUEKHJTP5PIox6Nuxr94DtlppZqu3n/CceXzx93VbyWyYrV2T2fl cDCl4x1al2zJ5KOp6dlFEC2rvzE7ufD25jCYKRxByZVLMDLTpkd3y4bdn6RHh2dg 7mObMflci5SJ7LnGOCYpQZzzEY9R5Ker6xrfzH2IRSAJjjwE38F3+0IcyIZssQgJ paTLGVuU0yklIeINRlHW7orelVI/MZBERhj9cilOeSa9lEim+9UuVvXmSLNJNeDh vxxNdkzzzR8D3IIvjNNJraax8LsEjx9ZM1hciN80tWf9mtHbSZynzU6UntZOJ7LN ZUoJ4lETPKBHB5iIgBvUXMS7s/e+bLtAYqYkL8UVxVd3T37FRLY= =XtAA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --5mCyUwZo2JvN/JJP--