From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] Add more qtmodules
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2017 18:11:20 -0500
Message-ID: <20170109231120.GA1437@jasmine>
References: <20170109100347.29913-1-efraim@flashner.co.il>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54174)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <leo@famulari.name>) id 1cQj67-0002ch-Nj
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Jan 2017 18:11:28 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <leo@famulari.name>) id 1cQj64-0000ZY-IV
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Jan 2017 18:11:27 -0500
Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:38514)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <leo@famulari.name>) id 1cQj63-0000ZJ-4g
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Jan 2017 18:11:24 -0500
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20170109100347.29913-1-efraim@flashner.co.il>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 12:03:38PM +0200, Efraim Flashner wrote:
> While I was working on them, I realized that the test suite wasn't really
> being run. I patched qtsvg to run the test suite (and therefor propagate to
> all the other qt modules), but everything started breaking, due to network
> tests, javascript dependencies, etc., so I've moved that to a separate branch
> locally to work on more later. However, I do think it would be be better to
> enable the tests in qtsvg and then disable them on most of the modules, so
> that way they're ready to be fixed and enabled without waiting for me to
> get around to it. Thoughts?

Sounds like a good plan.

> Efraim Flashner (9):
>   gnu: Add qtdeclarative-render2d.
>   gnu: Add qtserialbus.
>   gnu: Add qtgamepad.
>   gnu: Add qtscxml.
>   gnu: Add qtpurchasing.
>   gnu: Add qtcanvas3d.
>   gnu: Add qtcharts.
>   gnu: Add qtdatavis3d.

These LGTM overall.

>   gnu: Add qt3d.

This one doesn't seem to have been sent.