From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name>
Subject: Re: bug#25356: livestreamer no longer supported
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2017 15:28:12 -0500
Message-ID: <20170104202812.GD7042@jasmine>
References: <20170104160538.GA10030@khaalida>
	<87mvf6u0bd.fsf@wasp.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53073)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <leo@famulari.name>) id 1cOsAU-0007Tb-I1
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Jan 2017 15:28:19 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <leo@famulari.name>) id 1cOsAR-0004zY-9D
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Jan 2017 15:28:18 -0500
Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.26]:37615)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <leo@famulari.name>) id 1cOsAQ-0004wi-TN
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Jan 2017 15:28:15 -0500
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <87mvf6u0bd.fsf@wasp.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: ng0 <ng0@libertad.pw>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 06:50:14PM +0000, ng0 wrote:
> Do I read this correctly that they include some kind of
> anti-military license in there? I mean I am very much welcoming
> such an exclusion but with all the past discussions I had it lead
> to the point where it is not compatible with free software.
> 
> Do we have to strip OCB from the source?
> https://github.com/Legrandin/pycryptodome/blob/master/LICENSE.rst
> 
> Pycryptodome is a dependency of streamlink.

The question is about the OCB block cipher mode. I think we are able to
distribute implementations of it:

http://web.cs.ucdavis.edu/~rogaway/ocb/ocb-faq.htm#patent:phil
http://web.cs.ucdavis.edu/~rogaway/ocb/ocb-faq.htm#license
http://web.cs.ucdavis.edu/~rogaway/ocb/license.htm