unofficial mirror of guix-devel@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Danny Milosavljevic <dannym@scratchpost.org>
To: David Craven <david@craven.ch>
Cc: guix-devel <guix-devel@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: cargo-build-system: cargo-build-flags: --cfg=unix in package recipe
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2017 14:26:01 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170104142601.2b678a6a@scratchpost.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAL1_immdzbOWJ68N4E7UCwkEqZLyZP+BFHKCX9o43QnU0ncXsw@mail.gmail.com>

I'm against packaging unstable stuff. We would be packaging a moving target where everything breaks every day. Let's not.

There's a reason there are stable releases (of anything): there's (supposed to be) a (social) guarantee that the API doesn't change in incompatible ways.

If a library doesn't work in a stable release, upstream has to get it to work. Simple as that.
Otherwise it just shouldn't be packaged. People can still use cargo to install it so we aren't preventing anyone from using it.

That said, there could be a rustc-devel package (only for rustc). Other packages, people should be on their own.

Please, let's not make unstable stable by decree. If anything, upstream should just release more stuff as stable (if it's stable) :P

  reply	other threads:[~2017-01-04 13:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-01-03  1:10 cargo-build-system: cargo-build-flags: --cfg=unix in package recipe Danny Milosavljevic
2017-01-03  1:46 ` Danny Milosavljevic
2017-01-03  2:32 ` Danny Milosavljevic
2017-01-03 10:57   ` David Craven
2017-01-03 11:55     ` Danny Milosavljevic
2017-01-04 11:38       ` ng0
2017-01-04 11:45         ` David Craven
2017-01-04 13:26           ` Danny Milosavljevic [this message]
2017-01-04 13:44             ` ng0
2017-01-03 20:10     ` Danny Milosavljevic
2017-01-03 11:19 ` ng0
2017-01-03 12:02   ` Danny Milosavljevic
2017-01-03 14:09     ` ng0
2017-01-03 14:38       ` David Craven

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://guix.gnu.org/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170104142601.2b678a6a@scratchpost.org \
    --to=dannym@scratchpost.org \
    --cc=david@craven.ch \
    --cc=guix-devel@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).