On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 09:10:15PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote: > I see this in the log: > > $ git log --show-signature 6a34f4ccc8a5d4a48e25ad3c9c512f8634928b91 > commit 6a34f4ccc8a5d4a48e25ad3c9c512f8634928b91 > gpg: Signature made Wed 28 Dec 2016 08:38:21 PM EST > gpg: using RSA key 91CCDB9B48541B99 > gpg: BAD signature from "Tobias Geerinckx-Rice " [unknown] > Author: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice > Date: Wed Dec 28 23:01:49 2016 +0100 > > gnu: python-prompt-toolkit: Update to 1.0.9. > > * gnu/packages/python.scm (python-prompt-toolkit): Update to 1.0.9. > > Does anyone else get the same result? Any ideas? > > Tobias, what version of GnuPG are you using? > > I'm using: > > gnupg 2.1.17 /gnu/store/1sa7k3x3y3chdl31p7y7x3sa7p9h1qa3-gnupg-2.1.17 > > ... which is built from Guix commit 791ac6a68d1e4bc80f4760cd968cb6c26dbab9ba. I'm also unable to verify the signature of two more commits, as below. I've attached a handy Git signature verifier script. commit e0f8a520eda6b86a71f99eddf2c6968a95c8de0e gpg: Signature made Thu 24 Nov 2016 08:21:51 PM EST gpg: using RSA key 91CCDB9B48541B99 gpg: BAD signature from "Tobias Geerinckx-Rice " [unknown] Author: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice Date: Thu Nov 24 19:28:52 2016 +0100 gnu: miniupnpc: Improve synopsis and description. * gnu/packages/upnp.scm (miniupnp)[synopsis, description]: Edit, fix typos, add some relevant (search) terms from the home page, and expand acronyms. commit 7d162df8ce4dc90c681ff627b2ed94c192e6342f gpg: Signature made Thu 15 Dec 2016 09:08:42 PM EST gpg: using RSA key 91CCDB9B48541B99 gpg: BAD signature from "Tobias Geerinckx-Rice " [unknown] Author: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice Date: Thu Dec 15 23:17:52 2016 +0100 gnu: mcelog: Update to 146. * gnu/packages/linux.scm (mcelog): Update to 146.