From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: 01/02: gnu: gnupg: Update to 2.1.17. Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2016 08:39:37 -0500 Message-ID: <20161222133937.GB15995@jasmine> References: <20161220145709.4176.81597@vcs.savannah.gnu.org> <20161220145710.2DBFC220145@vcs.savannah.gnu.org> <87r3508mbg.fsf@netris.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42630) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cK3az-0005YC-GO for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Dec 2016 08:39:46 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cK3au-00050X-Lk for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Dec 2016 08:39:45 -0500 Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.27]:54159) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cK3au-0004zY-HD for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Dec 2016 08:39:40 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87r3508mbg.fsf@netris.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Mark H Weaver Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 02:17:23AM -0500, Mark H Weaver wrote: > > gnu: gnupg: Update to 2.1.17. > > > > * gnu/packages/gnupg.scm (gnupg): Update to 2.1.17. > > Unfortunately, this new version of gnupg consistently fails its test > suite on every system we support except for x86_64: > The error is always the same: > > --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- > make check-local > make[3]: Entering directory '/tmp/nix-build-gnupg-2.1.17.drv-0/gnupg-2.1.17/tests/gpgscm' > EXEEXT= GPGSCM_PATH=. \ > ./gpgscm ./t-child.scm > make[3]: *** [Makefile:838: check-local] Segmentation fault > --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- > > If you can't find a fix quickly, please revert this commit, because > several very important packages depend on it. Upstream discussion: https://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-devel/2016-December/032364.html