From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ng0 Subject: PATCH v2: c-toxcore, utox update, utox description Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2016 20:10:14 +0000 Message-ID: <20161218201017.3219-1-ng0@libertad.pw> Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46825) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cIhmw-00085h-Re for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Dec 2016 15:10:31 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cIhmw-00039F-4w for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Dec 2016 15:10:30 -0500 Received: from aibo.runbox.com ([91.220.196.211]:34228) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cIhmv-00038C-Tq for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Dec 2016 15:10:30 -0500 Received: from [10.9.9.211] (helo=mailfront11.runbox.com) by bars.runbox.com with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cIhmu-0002JA-PK for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Dec 2016 21:10:28 +0100 Received: from [176.67.168.210] (helo=localhost) by mailfront11.runbox.com with esmtpsa (uid:892961 ) (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) id 1cIhmf-0005mM-Sv for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Dec 2016 21:10:14 +0100 List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: guix-devel@gnu.org [PATCH 1/3] gnu: Add c-toxcore. [PATCH 2/3] gnu: utox: Update to 0.11.0. [PATCH 3/3] gnu: utox: Fix description. Applied the changes as requested, added some more infos about changed upstream. If the nature of c-toxcore is still not clear, take a look at all the other clients and their pull requests, and maybe ask directly upstream (as I have no time and no account on github), I just saw this new toxcore everyone is using now.