From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: maxima: Update to 5.39.0. Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2016 14:10:01 -0500 Message-ID: <20161218191001.GA16797@jasmine> References: <871sx64614.fsf@openmailbox.org> <87k2axnt21.fsf@kirby.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <87shpl2k56.fsf@openmailbox.org> <87h961nl1j.fsf@kirby.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="VS++wcV0S1rZb1Fb" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36973) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cIgqY-000165-Cy for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Dec 2016 14:10:11 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cIgqT-0000hH-FB for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Dec 2016 14:10:10 -0500 Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:45723) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cIgqT-0000gl-Aa for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Dec 2016 14:10:05 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87h961nl1j.fsf@kirby.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Marius Bakke Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org --VS++wcV0S1rZb1Fb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Dec 18, 2016 at 07:34:32PM +0100, Marius Bakke wrote: > Kei Kebreau writes: >=20 > >> I've found 'diffoscope' to be useful when troubleshooting > >> reproducibility problems. E.g. by running it on two cancelled builds, = or > >> by installing to different output paths with a superficial change to t= he > >> expression. It will show sections that differs which may aid locating > >> the offending code. > >> > > > > Yes. I see that diffoscope complains about missing 'xxd'. That may be > > useful to package (unless we already have it and I'm just oblivious). >=20 > 'xxd' is distributed with the 'vim' package. Is the error fatal? Perhaps > we should patch diffoscope with the absolute path to xxd. The warning message in the source code is: "xxd not available in path. Falling back to Python hexlify." So, I guess the built-in hexlify is a fine fall-back for now. --VS++wcV0S1rZb1Fb Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEsFFZSPHn08G5gDigJkb6MLrKfwgFAlhW3wkACgkQJkb6MLrK fwhwyxAA5cxOaLURK0ravgO9JAXfny/7ZaCQWt0mM/PJulqVwWhmQPDTUer0AB1U InZV+q9ckiOj3EYs0SRnOZXOsTJeI1qWxqNBl55k/Cda4SYGlLEbe/rusvRWKSmT 8BsuUZueoGCEaxxwP17RU+50I6/2itKIfLhVVzI1f0NzHVVaOroDaF96qLaVqb7m J8auzzud3ZAz2FyZ5Y1OUVWUoivmzpHJnNAeKA2LbDSZKWDZ3SrXb8fQwGDs8Xth /YQjtFEOvnS/hPPJApMvpPeQgPNJS1db2d4a0TpMKcQvlIDvAsIyNi/a87xYts/J eyG0Stxl+nqWEAXyHn9/B+aOY1FylM+LhD7MnbC5ePY7aSzCGGE7IXZAyPQb7eUb CvjYWZYo7DRniVnnnr9w7+DntstAc7UZRUlKBsEyLKclU+BvSmsDhXV/zZPM/Ty5 58dSHXC6HhHWy0Jm04qknN4DMbrMsp59K35KQn5/9YDtaPAs7GIe+6W+9za1xqNJ bv8KbPjqoBCuGCRc3VyF7TnCfns+zzHph50kjW9VWnS/9mLFkVAmXB8W4DMv5GNW WYDFaAn/QyAkFK2JRkZ3WbAJDJ9NMvAGAVt7Rl+T1FRrS4tXxmoQiLUXarmZnCPU WvGe+H0OMua5Tjewbt7aS7B9mYx9e3HkuH6hI1M3CxLzmKH0K30= =QQOT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --VS++wcV0S1rZb1Fb--