From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: 01/01: gnu: python-pyopenssl: Disable tests. Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2016 15:20:09 -0500 Message-ID: <20161216202009.GK20488@jasmine> References: <20161214173803.7999.79849@vcs.savannah.gnu.org> <20161214173804.3FE492201BA@vcs.savannah.gnu.org> <20161215234919.GA14722@jasmine> <8760mkrous.fsf@kirby.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="+pHx0qQiF2pBVqBT" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54044) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cHyzG-0008NN-IP for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Dec 2016 15:20:15 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cHyzC-0006ap-JS for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Dec 2016 15:20:14 -0500 Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.27]:48967) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cHyzC-0006aY-FI for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Dec 2016 15:20:10 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <8760mkrous.fsf@kirby.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Marius Bakke Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org --+pHx0qQiF2pBVqBT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 02:21:47PM +0100, Marius Bakke wrote: > Leo Famulari writes: > > On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 05:38:04PM +0000, Marius Bakke wrote: > >> + (arguments > >> + ;; FIXME: Some tests fail with "NameError: name 'long' is not de= fined". > >> + '(#:tests? #f)) > > > > Do you think this indicates a real problem? Or is the issue limited to > > the tests? >=20 > I dug a bit further into this, and the problem is likely that PYTHONPATH > is incomplete at test time. Moving 'check after 'install and adding a > proper PYTHONPATH seems to work, but now I ran into a test needing > network access. >=20 > https://github.com/pyca/pyopenssl/blob/16.2.0/tests/test_ssl.py#L1186 >=20 > I'll prepare a patch to remove that test entirely, unless someone knows > a clever way to check for network access and conditionally skip it > (which I'm sure upstream would be happy to accept). I think it's fine to simply skip or remove that test. Thanks! --+pHx0qQiF2pBVqBT Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEsFFZSPHn08G5gDigJkb6MLrKfwgFAlhUTHkACgkQJkb6MLrK fwig9g//bz9tGY9h/X1r1THAreSlFMBNLSCdVYZrNZPOMWFRuOIN2/e5lrwk4J6v 1XN13fwu01xknw09/wsjD6gIaEFQcKjTDvJEn33wg43HRg6gdciMADoSbXo/0yk6 TqlKovUoefZoNi/A1iaXvv9Fb3nnXQqI7omJffVO0ScNc0c6W5amm+3TecGTL0Oj 1dvXO2r6NRQblweZhjD0jaKNaGsRAo2EgGXCRxY93TBEsdT/f1YwylWQe5dk2jYy iCE17Uv7obL0cPIC6z2uYz0H/xu73eJZZBlCX7fhup5q7li5L82mRHpchxZcDv03 yYIyZbLgFZrEoniL1/y/hu33nMyhmw2/wUwCmvFv9/Lo5zlpOKmmK23x+cjIT3Mr Y0Thyh5/ymKULW5ZhvBcw7c7DG7krRBAXth0Oy05IN4wEwAZ6A0wR1bOWd+Qo2dx FaplwQH/XlQjMmT7CQr3rGvCo5kfAt+Ql4mWL4mxjyTqGkd4YPVJ+C1DpoLB9m7W ztdaJ70A3m39idkM7LSoNeuzXgACqRU9zk8rEEywsYmOpGAJ9jn8WyFKy/kVeEUm 4rY+1hjSertUrTkYfXjdT7XyJXs3kiWgft3FUIBB6bU2mH2+0XtJ35pHgsI2HJ81 FTOUN0tVTTENrt6v7BKc5UclJ2oTPNfV1LcG/MeYAb+iSmJ0F28= =5A/I -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --+pHx0qQiF2pBVqBT--